Key issues in estimating energy and greenhouse gas savings of biofuels: challenges and perspectives

Document Type: Review Paper

Authors

1 School of Environment and Sustainable Development, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar-382030, Gujarat, India.

2 Solid Waste Research Group, Center of Excellence in Environmental Studies (CEES), King Abdul Aziz University, P.O Box: 80216, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.

3 Government of India, Ministry of Science and Technology, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR), Technology Bhawan, New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi- 110016 India.

4 Separation and Conversion Technologies, VITO-Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium.

Abstract

The increasing demand for biofuels has encouraged the researchers and policy makers worldwide to find sustainable biofuel production systems in accordance with the regional conditions and needs. The sustainability of a biofuel production system includes energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) saving along with environmental and social acceptability. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an internationally recognized tool for determining the sustainability of biofuels. LCA includes goal and scope, life cycle inventory, life cycle impact assessment, and interpretation as major steps. LCA results vary significantly, if there are any variations in performing these steps. For instance, biofuel producing feedstocks have different environmental values that lead to different GHG emission savings and energy balances. Similarly, land-use and land-use changes may overestimate biofuel sustainability. This study aims to examine various biofuel production systems for their GHG savings and energy balances, relative to conventional fossil fuels with an ambition to address the challenges and to offer future directions for LCA based biofuel studies. Environmental and social acceptability of biofuel production is the key factor in developing biofuel support policies. Higher GHG emission saving and energy balance of biofuel can be achieved, if biomass yield is high, and ecologically sustainable biomass or non-food biomass is converted into biofuel and used efficiently.

Graphical Abstract

Key issues in estimating energy and greenhouse gas savings of biofuels: challenges and perspectives

Highlights

  • Land-use and land-use changes may overestimate the biofuel sustainability.

  • Environmental and social acceptability is essential in making biofuel-support policies.

  • Different biomass result in different energy balances and GHG savings of biofuels.

  • Sustainable biomass or non-food biomass can increase biofuel sustainability ranking.

Keywords


[18] Choudhury, R., Weber, T., Schindler, J., Weindorf, W., Wurster., R., 2002. GM well to wheel analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/ vehicle systems- a European study. Ottobrunn, Germany.

[31] Dreier, T. Tzscheutschler, P., 2001. Ganzheitliche Systemanalyse für die Erzeugung und Anwendung von Biodiesel und Naturdiesel im Verkehrssektor. Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Gelbes Heft 72, München.

[47] Glenister, D., Nunes, V., 2011. Understanding sustainable biofuels production, the EU renewable energy directive and international initiatives to verify sustainability - A discussion about the global importance of ensuring biofuels are produced sustainably and the international initiatives to drive the market in a sociality accettable and environmentally friendly well-managed direction”, White Paper, Systems and Services Certification, SGS.

[49] Gnansounou, E., Dauriat, A., Panichelli, L., Villegas, J.D., 2009. Estimating energy and green house gas balance of various biofuel: concept and Methodologies; working paper. EPFL-ENAC-LASEN.

[64] Jungbluth, N., Büsser, S., Frischknecht, R., Tuchschmid, M., 2008. Life cycle assessment of biomass-to-liquid fuels. Draft Report. ESU Services GmbH, Uster, Germany.

[72] Khanna, M., Scheffran, J., Ziberman, D., 2010. Handbook of bioenergy economics and policy. Springer Science and Business Media.

[86] Lechón, Y., Cabal, H., de la Rúa, C., Lago, C., Izquierdo, L., Sáez. R., 2010. Life cycle environmental aspects of biofuel goals in Spain. Scenarios. 15th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition- From Research to Market Deployment. 7-11. May 2007, Berlin.

[103] Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Breon, F., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., 2013. Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. Clim. Change. 423.

[118] Paul, N., Kemnitz, D., 2006. Biofuels- Plant raw materials, Products. Fachagentur, Nachwachsende Rohstoffe eV (FNR), WPR communications, Berlin, 43.

[126] Rehan, M., Nizami, A.S., Shahzad, K., Ouda, O.K.M., Ismail, I.M.I., Almeelbi, T., Iqbal T., Demirbas, A. 2016. Pyrolytic liquid fuel: a source of renewable energy in Makkah. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. DOI:10.1080/15567036.2016.1153753

[138] Sadaf, Y., Nizami, A.S., Batool, S.A., Chaudhary, M.N., Ouda, O.K.M., Asam, Z.Z., Habib, K., Rehan, M., Demibras, A., 2016. Waste-to-energy and recycling value for developing integrated solid waste management plan in Lahore. Energy Sources. Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy.

[148] Singh, A., Murphy, J.D., 2009. Biomethane from animal waste and grass for clean vehicular biofuel in Ireland. Twelfth International Waste Management and Landfi ll Symposium, CISA, Environmental Santiary Engineering Centre, Italy Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy.

[158] Thyø, K.A., Wenzel, H., 2007. Life Cycle Assessment of biogas from maize silage and from manure - for transport and for heat and power production under displacement of natural gas based heat works and marginal electricity in northern Germany. 2nd draft report for Xergi A/S Sofiendalsvej 7, 9200 Aalborg SV.

[163] Veeraraghavan, S., Riera-Palou, X., 2006. Well-to wheel performance of Iogen lignocellulosic ethanol. Shell Global Solutions International.

[169] Zah, R., Böni, H., Gauch, M., Hischier, R., Lehmann, M., Wäger, P., 2007. Ökobilanz von Energieprodukten: Ökologische Bewertung von Biotreibstoffen. EMPA, St. Gallen, Switzerland.