Home Articles List Article Information

|
|
|
Export Citation
RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
|
Share

Beyond the conventional “life cycle” assessment

Editorial, Volume 4, Issue 3, Summer 2017, Page 637-637 PDF (8391 K)

DOI: 10.18331/BRJ2017.4.3.2

Author

¹^{, 2}

¹CSRA Inc., USA

²University of Minnesota, USA

Graphical Abstract

Beyond the conventional “life cycle” assessment

References

[1] Rajagopal, D., 2017. A step towards a general framework for consequential life cycle assessment. J. Industrial Ecol. 21(2), 261-271.

[2] Rajagopal, D., Vanderghem, C., MacLean, H.L., 2017. Life Cycle Assessment for Economists. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 9(1).

[3] Robertson, G.P., et al., 2017. Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: choices and outcomes. Science, 356(6345), p.eaal2324.

[4] Yang, Y., 2016. Two sides of the same coin: consequential life cycle assessment based on the attributional framework. J. Cleaner Prod. 127, 274-281.

[5] Yang, Y., 2017. Does hybrid LCA with a complete system boundary yield adequate results for product promotion?. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22(3), 456-460.

[6] Yang, Y., Heijungs, R., 2017. On the use of different models for consequential life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1-8.

Statistics

Article View: 95

PDF Download: 109