Beyond the conventional “life cycle” assessment

	Beyond the conventional “life cycle” assessment
Editorial, Volume 4, Issue 3, Summer 2017, Page 637-637 PDF (8.19 MB)
DOI: 10.18331/BRJ2017.4.3.2
Author
Yi Yang ¹^{, 2}
¹CSRA Inc., USA
²University of Minnesota, USA
Graphical Abstract



References
[1] Rajagopal, D., 2017. A step towards a general framework for consequential life cycle assessment. J. Industrial Ecol. 21(2), 261-271. [2] Rajagopal, D., Vanderghem, C., MacLean, H.L., 2017. Life Cycle Assessment for Economists. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 9(1). [3] Robertson, G.P., et al., 2017. Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: choices and outcomes. Science, 356(6345), p.eaal2324. [4] Yang, Y., 2016. Two sides of the same coin: consequential life cycle assessment based on the attributional framework. J. Cleaner Prod. 127, 274-281. [5] Yang, Y., 2017. Does hybrid LCA with a complete system boundary yield adequate results for product promotion?. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22(3), 456-460. [6] Yang, Y., Heijungs, R., 2017. On the use of different models for consequential life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1-8.
Statistics Article View: 452 PDF Download: 582