Recent trends on techno-economic assessment (TEA) of sugarcane biorefineries

Document Type : Review Paper

Authors

Department of Process Engineering, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.

Abstract

Sustainability challenges, e.g., climate change, resource depletion, and expanding populations, have triggered a swift move towards a circular bio-economy which is expected to evolve progressively in the coming decades. However, the transition from a fossil fuel-based economy to a bio-based economy requires the exploitation of scientific innovations and step changes in the infrastructure of chemical industry. Biorefineries have been extensively investigated for biofuel production from first and second generation feedstocks, whereas some research activities have been conducted on production of biochemical and biopolymers from renewable resources. Techno-economic evaluation of diverse technologies for production of biofuels and biochemical is a crucial step for decision making in the development of bio-economy. This contribution focuses on the economic studies carried out on biorefineries converting sugarcane bagasse, due to its availability and importance in the South African context, into value-added products. Recent studies on biofuel production via biochemical pathway, e.g., ethanol, butanol, or thermochemical pathway, e.g., methanol and bio jet fuel as well as production of biochemicals with high market demands and diverse applications such as lactic acid, succinic acid, and xylitol have been briefly reviewed. In addition, an overview on the production of biopolymers such as polyl-lactic acid and bio-based monomers, i.e., butanediol, from sugarcane bagasse is reported.

Graphical Abstract

Recent trends on techno-economic assessment (TEA) of sugarcane biorefineries

Highlights

  • Sugar mills have opportunities to become economically-viable biorefineries.
  • TEA of biofuels, biochemical, and biopolymers form sugarcane were reviewed.
  • TEA is vital to sift through the product options to define investment opportunities.
  • More research is required for biochemical and biopolymer production scenarios.

Keywords

References

[1] Albarelli, J.Q., Onorati, S., Caliandro, P., Peduzzi, E., Meireles, M.A.A., Marechal, F., Ensinas, A.V., 2015. Multi-objective optimization of a sugarcane biorefinery for integrated ethanol and methanol production. Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.104
[2] Alves, C.M., Valk, M., de Jong, S., Bonomi, A., van der Wielen, L.A., Mussatto, S.I., 2017. Techno‐economic assessment of biorefinery technologies for aviation biofuels supply chains in Brazil. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 11(1), 67-91.
[3] Baeyens, J., Kang, Q., Appels, L., Dewil, R., Lv, Y., Tan, T., 2015. Challenges and opportunities in improving the production of bio-ethanol. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 47, 60-88.
[4] Balan, V., Chiaramonti, D., Kumar, S., 2013. Review of US and EU initiatives toward development, demonstration, and commercialization of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 7(6), 732-759.
[5] Bezerra, T.L., Ragauskas, A.J., 2016. A review of sugarcane bagasse for second‐generation bioethanol and biopower production. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 10(5), 634-647.
[6] Bhutto, A.W., Qureshi, K., Abro, R., Harijan, K., Zhao, Z., Bazmi, A.A., Abbas, T., Yu, G., 2016. Progress in the production of biomass-to-liquid biofuels to decarbonize the transport sector–prospects and challenges. RSC Adv. 6(38), 32140-32170.
[7] Biddy, M.J., Scarlata, C., Kinchin, C., 2016. Chemicals from biomass: A market assessment of bioproducts with near-term potential (No. NREL/TP--5100-65509). National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
[8] Bos, H.L., Sanders, J.P., 2013. Raw material demand and sourcing options for the development of a bio‐based chemical industry in Europe. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 7(3), 246-259.
[9] Bozzano, G.,  Manenti, F., 2016. Efficient methanol synthesis: perspectives, technologies and optimization strategies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 56, 71-105.
[10] Brown, T.R., 2015. A techno-economic review of thermochemical cellulosic biofuel pathways. Bioresour. Technol. 178, 166-176.
[11] Castro-Aguirre, E., Iñiguez-Franco, F., Samsudin, H., Fang, X., Auras, R., 2016. Poly (lactic acid)—Mass production, processing, industrial applications, and end of life. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 107, 333-366.
[12] Cespi, D., Passarini, F., Vassura, I., Cavani, F., 2016. Butadiene from biomass, a life cycle perspective to address sustainability in the chemical industry. Green Chem. 18(6), 1625-1638.
[13] Chum, H.L., Warner, E., Seabra, J.E., Macedo, I.C., 2014. A comparison of commercial ethanol production systems from Brazilian sugarcane and US corn. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 8(2), 205-223.
[14] Clauser, N.M., Gutiérrez, S., Area, M.C., Felissia, F.E., Vallejos, M.E., 2016. Small-sized biorefineries as strategy to add value to sugarcane bagasse. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 107, 137-146.
[15] Crank, M., Patel, M., Marscheider-Weidemann, F., Schleich, J., Hüsing, B., Angerer, G., 2004. Techno-economic feasibility of large-scale production of bio-based polymers in Europe (PRO-BIP). Final report (No. NWS-E--2004-111). Department of Science.
[16] Dang, Q., Hu, W., Rover, M., Brown, R.C., Wright, M.M., 2016. Economics of biofuels and bioproducts from an integrated pyrolysis biorefinery. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 10(6), 790-803.
[17] Dias, M.O., Junqueira, T.L., Cavalett, O., Pavanello, L.G., Cunha, M.P., Jesus, C.D., Maciel Filho, R., Bonomi, A., 2013a. Biorefineries for the production of first and second generation ethanol and electricity from sugarcane. Appl. Energy. 109, 72-78.
[18] Dias, M.O., Junqueira, T.L., Cavalett, O., Cunha, M.P., Jesus, C.D., Mantelatto, P.E., Rossell, C.E., Maciel Filho, R., Bonomi, A., 2013b. Cogeneration in integrated first and second generation ethanol from sugarcane. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 91(8), 1411-1417.
[19] Dias, M.O., Pereira, L.G., Junqueira, T.L., Pavanello, L.G., Chagas, M.F., Cavalett, O., Maciel Filho, R., Bonomi, A., 2014. Butanol production in a sugarcane biorefinery using ethanol as feedstock. Part I: Integration to a first generation sugarcane distillery. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 92(8), 1441-1451.
[20] Dias, M.O., Maciel Filho, R., Mantelatto, P.E., Cavalett, O., Rossell, C.E.V., Bonomi, A., Leal, M.R.L.V., 2015. Sugarcane processing for ethanol and sugar in Brazil. Environmen.  Dev. 15, 35-51.
[21] Diederichs, G.W., Mandegari, M.A., Farzad, S., Görgens, J.F., 2016. Techno-economic comparison of biojet fuel production from lignocellulose, vegetable oil and sugar cane juice. Bioresour. Technol. 216, 331-339.
[22] Farzad, S., Mandegari, M.A., Görgens, J.F., 2016. A critical review on biomass gasification, co-gasification, and their environmental assessments. Biofuel Res. J. 3(4), 483-495.
[23] Farzad, S., Mandegari, M.A., Guo, M., Haigh, K.F., Shah, N., Görgens, J.F., 2017a. Multi-product biorefineries from lignocelluloses: a pathway to revitalisation of the sugar industry?. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 10(1), 87.
[24] Farzad, S., Mandegari, M.A., Görgens, J.F., 2017b. Integrated techno-economic and environmental analysis of butadiene production from biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 239, 37-48.
[25] Fernández-Dacosta, C., Posada, J.A., Kleerebezem, R., Cuellar, M.C., Ramirez, A., 2015. Microbial community-based polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) production from wastewater: techno-economic analysis and ex-ante environmental assessment. Bioresour. Technol. 185, 368-377.
[26] FitzPatrick, M., Champagne, P., Cunningham, M.F., Whitney, R.A., 2010. A biorefinery processing perspective: treatment of lignocellulosic materials for the production of value-added products. Bioresour. Technol. 101(23), 8915-8922.
[27] Gao, C., Ma, C. , Xu, P., 2011. Biotechnological routes based on lactic acid production from biomass. Biotechnol. Adv. 29(6), 930-939.
[28] Gubicza, K., Nieves, I.U., Sagues, W.J., Barta, Z., Shanmugam, K.T., Ingram, L.O., 2016. Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse using a Liquefaction plus Simultaneous Saccharification and co-Fermentation process. Bioresour. Technol. 208, 42-48.
[29] Huang, H.J., Yuan, X.Z., 2015. Recent progress in the direct liquefaction of typical biomass. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 49, 59-80.
[30] Jiang, Y., Liu, J., Jiang, W., Yang, Y., Yang, S., 2015. Current status and prospects of industrial bio-production of n-butanol in China. Biotechnol. Adv. 33(7), 1493-1501.
[31] Jin, C., Yao, M., Liu, H., Chia-fon, F.L., Ji, J., 2011. Progress in the production and application of n-butanol as a biofuel. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 15(8), 4080-4106.
[32] Kamat, S., Khot, M., Zinjarde, S., RaviKumar, A., Gade, W.N., 2013. Coupled production of single cell oil as biodiesel feedstock, xylitol and xylanase from sugarcane bagasse in a biorefinery concept using fungi from the tropical mangrove wetlands. Bioresour. Technol. 135, 246-253.
[33] Klein‐Marcuschamer, D., Turner, C., Allen, M., Gray, P., Dietzgen, R.G., Gresshoff, P.M., Hankamer, B., Heimann, K., Scott, P.T., Stephens, E., Speight, R., 2013. Technoeconomic analysis of renewable aviation fuel from microalgae, Pongamia pinnata, and sugarcane. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 7(4), 416-428.
[34] Koutinas, A.A., Vlysidis, A., Pleissner, D., Kopsahelis, N., Garcia, I.L., Kookos, I.K., Papanikolaou, S., Kwan, T.H., Lin, C.S.K., 2014. Valorization of industrial waste and by-product streams via fermentation for the production of chemicals and biopolymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(8), 2587-2627.
[35] Koutinas, A.A., Yepez, B., Kopsahelis, N., Freire, D.M., de Castro, A.M., Papanikolaou, S., Kookos, I.K., 2016. Techno-economic evaluation of a complete bioprocess for 2, 3-butanediol production from renewable resources. Bioresour. Technol. 204, 55-64.
[36] Lange, J.P., 2007. Lignocellulose conversion: an introduction to chemistry, process and economics. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 1(1), 39-48.
[37] Luo, L., van der Voet, E., Huppes, G., 2010. Biorefining of lignocellulosic feedstock–Technical, economic and environmental considerations. Bioresour. Technol. 101(13), 5023-5032.
[38] Macrelli, S., Mogensen, J., Zacchi, G., 2012. Techno-economic evaluation of 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugar cane bagasse and leaves integrated with the sugar-based ethanol process. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 5(1), 22.
[39] Makshina, E.V., Dusselier, M., Janssens, W., Degreve, J., Jacobs, P.A., Sels, B.F., 2014. Review of old chemistry and new catalytic advances in the on-purpose synthesis of butadiene. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(22), 7917-7953.
[40] Mandegari, M.A., Farzad, S., Görgens, J.F., 2017a. Economic and environmental assessment of cellulosic ethanol production scenarios annexed to a typical sugar mill. Bioresour. Technol. 224, 314-326.
[41] Mandegari, M.A., Farzad, S., van Rensburg, E., Görgens, J. F., 2017b. Multi criteria analysis of a biorefinery for co- production of lactic acid and ethanol from sugarcane lignocellulose. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin. (10.1002/bbb.1801).
[42] Mariano, A.P., Dias, M.O., Junqueira, T.L., Cunha, M.P., Bonomi, A., Maciel Filho, R., 2013. Butanol production in a first-generation Brazilian sugarcane biorefinery: technical aspects and economics of greenfield projects. Bioresour. Technol. 135, 316-323.
[43] Mawhood, R., Gazis, E., de Jong, S., Hoefnagels, R., Slade, R., 2016. Production pathways for renewable jet fuel: a review of commercialization status and future prospects. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 10(4), 462-484.
[44] Michailos, S., Parker, D., Webb, C., 2017. A techno-economic comparison of Fischer–Tropsch and fast pyrolysis as ways of utilizing sugar cane bagasse in transportation fuels production. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 118, 206-214.
[45] Mohamad, N.L., Mustapa Kamal, S.M., Mokhtar, M.N., 2015. Xylitol biological production: a review of recent studies. Food Rev. Int. 31(1), 74-89.
[46] Moncada, J., El-Halwagi, M.M., Cardona, C.A., 2013. Techno-economic analysis for a sugarcane biorefinery: Colombian case. Bioresour. Technol. 135, 533-543.
[47] Mudliar, S.N., Vaidya, A.N., Kumar, M.S., Dahikar, S., Chakrabarti, T., 2008. Techno-economic evaluation of PHB production from activated sludge. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 10(3), 255.
[48] Mussatto, S.I., van Loosdrecht, M., 2016. Cellulose: a key polymer for a greener, healthier, and bio-based future. Biofuel Res. J. 3(4), 482-482.
[49] Ndaba, B., Chiyanzu, I., Marx, S., 2015. n-Butanol derived from biochemical and chemical routes: a review. Biotechnol. Rep. 8, 1-9.
[50] Nsaful, F., Görgens, J.F., Knoetze, J.H., 2013. Comparison of combustion and pyrolysis for energy generation in a sugarcane mill. Energy Convers. Manage. 74, 524-534.
[51] Ochoa, J.V., Bandinelli, C., Vozniuk, O., Chieregato, A., Malmusi, A., Recchi, C., Cavani, F., 2016. An analysis of the chemical, physical and reactivity features of MgO–SiO 2 catalysts for butadiene synthesis with the Lebedev process. Green Chem. 18(6), 1653-1663.
[52] Oliveira, F.M., Pinheiro, I.O., Souto-Maior, A.M., Martin, C., Gonçalves, A.R., Rocha, G.J., 2013. Industrial-scale steam explosion pretreatment of sugarcane straw for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose for production of second generation ethanol and value-added products. Bioresour. Technol. 130, 168-173.
[53] Parajuli, R., Dalgaard, T., Jørgensen, U., Adamsen, A.P.S., Knudsen, M.T., Birkved, M., Gylling, M., Schjørring, J.K., 2015. Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: a review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 43, 244-263.
[54] Peplow, M., 2014. Cellulosic ethanol fights for life. Nature. 507(7491), 152.
[55] Pereira, L.G., Dias, M.O.S, Junqueira, T.L., Pavanello, L.G., Chagas, M.F., Cavalett, O., Maciel Filho, R., Bonomi, A., 2014. Butanol production in a sugarcane biorefinery using ethanol as feedstock. Part II: Integration to a second generation sugarcane distillery. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 92(8), 1452-1462.
[56] Pereira, L.G., Dias, M.O.S., Mariano, A.P., Maciel Filho, R., Bonomi, A.M.F.L.J., 2015. Economic and environmental assessment of n-butanol production in an integrated first and second generation sugarcane biorefinery: fermentative versus catalytic routes. Appl. Energy. 160, 120-131.
[57] Petersen, A.M., Aneke, M.C., Görgens, J.F., 2014. Techno-economic comparison of ethanol and electricity coproduction schemes from sugarcane residues at existing sugar mills in Southern Africa. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 7(1), 105.
[58] Petersen, A.M., Farzad, S., Görgens, J.F., 2015. Techno-economic assessment of integrating methanol or Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in a South African sugar mill. Bioresour. Technol. 183, 141-152.
[59] Renó, M.L.G., del Olmo, O.A., Palacio, J.C.E., Lora, E.E.S., Venturini, O.J., 2014. Sugarcane biorefineries: case studies applied to the Brazilian sugar–alcohol industry. Energy Convers. Manage. 86, 981-991.
[60] Sánchez, Ó.J., Cardona, C.A., 2012. Conceptual design of cost-effective and environmentally-friendly configurations for fuel ethanol production from sugarcane by knowledge-based process synthesis. Bioresour. Technol. 104, 305-314.
[61] Santos, C.I., Silva, C.C., Mussatto, S.I., Osseweijer, P., van der Wielen, L.A., Posada, J.A., 2017. Integrated 1st and 2nd generation sugarcane bio-refinery for jet fuel production in Brazil: Techno-economic and greenhouse gas emissions assessment. Renew. Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.011
[62] Seabra, J.E., Tao, L., Chum, H.L., Macedo, I.C., 2010. A techno-economic evaluation of the effects of centralized cellulosic ethanol and co-products refinery options with sugarcane mill clustering. Biomass Bioenergy. 34(8), 1065-1078.
[63] Seabra, J.E., Macedo, I.C., 2011. Comparative analysis for power generation and ethanol production from sugarcane residual biomass in Brazil. Energy Policy. 39(1), 421-428.
[64] Shamsul, N.S., Kamarudin, S.K., Rahman, N.A., Kofli, N.T., 2014. An overview on the production of bio-methanol as potential renewable energy. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 33, 578-588.
[65] Sindhu, R., Gnansounou, E., Binod, P., Pandey, A., 2016. Bioconversion of sugarcane crop residue for value added products–an overview. Renew. Energy. 98, 203-215.
[66] Smithers, J., 2014. Review of sugarcane trash recovery systems for energy cogeneration in South Africa. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 32, 915-925.
[67] Sushkevich, V.L., Ivanova, I.I., Taarning, E., 2015. Ethanol conversion into butadiene over Zr-containing molecular sieves doped with silver. Green Chem. 17(4), 2552-2559.
[68] Tan, E.C., Talmadge, M., Dutta, A., Hensley, J., Schaidle, J., Biddy, M., Humbird, D., Snowden-Swan, L.J., Ross, J., Sexton, D., Yap, R., 2015. Process design and economics for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to hydrocarbons via indirect liquefaction. thermochemical research pathway to high-octane gasoline blendstock through methanol/dimethyl ether intermediates (No. NREL/TP-5100-62402). National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
[69] Taylor, R., Nattrass, L., Alberts, G., Robson, P., Chudziak, C., Bauen, A., Libelli, I.M., Lotti, G., Prussi, M., Nistri, R., Chiaramonti, D., 2015. From the sugar platform to biofuels and biochemicals: final report for the European Commission Directorate-General Energy.
[70] Wang, W.C., Tao, L., 2016. Bio-jet fuel conversion technologies. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 53, 801-822.
[71] White, W.C., 2007. Butadiene production process overview. Chem. Biol. Interact. 166(1), 10-14.

Files

Cited by

Share

How to cite

Statistics