Improved microbial conversion of de-oiled Jatropha waste into biohydrogen via inoculum pretreatment: process optimization by experimental design approach

Document Type: Research Paper


1 Center for Materials Cycles and Waste Management Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan.

2 Research Institute on Bioengineering, Membrane Technology and Energetics, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10, 8200 Veszprém, Hungary.

3 Department of Environmental Engineering, Daegu University, Republic of Korea.

4 Department of Environmental Engineering and Science, Feng Chia University, 40724 Taichung, Taiwan.


In this study various pretreatment methods of sewage sludge inoculum and the statistical process optimization of de-oiled jatropha waste have been reported. Peak hydrogen production rate (HPR) and hydrogen yield (HY) of 0.36 L H2/L-d and 20 mL H2/g Volatile Solid (VS) were obtained when heat shock pretreatment (95 oC, 30 min) was employed. Afterwards, an experimental design was applied to find the optimal conditions for H2 production using heat-pretreated seed culture. The optimal substrate concentration, pH and temperature were determined by using response surface methodology as 205 g/L, 6.53 and 55.1 oC, respectively. Under these circumstances, the highest HPR of 1.36 L H2/L-d was predicted. Verification tests proved the reliability of the statistical approach. As a result of the heat pretreatment and fermentation optimization, a significant (~ 4 folds) increase in HPR was achieved. PCR-DGGE results revealed that Clostridium sp. were majorly present under the optimal conditions.

Graphical Abstract

Improved microbial conversion of de-oiled Jatropha waste into biohydrogen via inoculum pretreatment: process optimization by experimental design approach


Akil, K., Jayanthi, S., 2014. The biohydrogen potential of distillery wastewater by dark fermentation in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Int. J. Green Energy. 11, 28-39.

Chen, C.C., Lin, C.Y., Lin, M.C., 2002. Acid-base enrichment enhances anaerobic hydrogen production process. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 58, 224-228.

Chong, M.L., Abdul Rahman, N.A., Rahim, R.A., Aziz, S.A., Shirai, Y., Hassan, M.A., 2009. Optimization of biohydrogen production by Clostridium butyricum EB6 from palm oil mill effluent using response surface methodology. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 34, 7475-7482.

Dabrock, B., Bahl, H., Gottschalk, G., 1992. Parameters affecting solvent production by Clostridium pasteurianum. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 58, 1233-1239.

Demirbas, A., 2007. Progress and recent trends in biofuels. Prog. Energy. Combust. Sci. 33, 1-18.

Diamantis, V., Khan, A., Ntougias, S., Stamatelatou, K., Kapagiannidis, A.G., Aivasidis, A., 2013. Continuous biohydrogen production from fruit wastewater at low pH conditions. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 36, 965-974.

Ewan, B.C.R., Allen, R.W.K., 2005. A figure of merit assessment of the routes to hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 30, 809-819.

Fan, Y.T., Zhang, G.S., Guo, X.Y., Xing, Y., Fan, M.H., 2006. Biohydrogen-production from beer lees biomass by cow dung compost. Biomass Bioenergy. 30, 493-496.

Geng, A., He, Y., Qian, C., Yan, X., Zhou, Z., 2010. Effect of key factors on hydrogen production from cellulose in a co-culture of Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium thermopalmarium. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4029-4033.

Guo, W.Q., Ren, N.Q., Wang, X.J., Xiang, W.S., Ding, J., You, Y., Liu, B.F., 2009. Optimization of culture conditions for hydrogen production by Ethanoligenens harbinense B49 using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 1192-1196.

Hallenbeck, P.C., 2009. Fermentative hydrogen production: Principles, progress, and prognosis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 34, 7379-7389.

Han, J., Lee, D., Cho, J., Lee, J., Kim, S., 2012. Hydrogen production from biodiesel byproduct by immobilized Enterobacter aerogenes. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 35, 151-157.

Hawkes, F.R., Hussy, I., Kyazze, G., Dinsdale, R., Hawkes, D.L., 2007. Continuous dark fermentative hydrogen production by mesophilic microflora: Principles and progress. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 32, 172-184.

Khanal, S.K., Chen, W.H., Li, L., Sung, S., 2004. Biological hydrogen production: Effects of pH and intermediate products. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 29, 1123-1131.

Kim, S.H., Han, S.K., Shin, H.S., 2004. Feasibility of biohydrogen production by anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 29, 1607-1616.

Kumar, G., Lay, C.H., Chu, C.Y., Wu, J.H., Lee, S.C., Lin, C.Y., 2012. Seed inocula for biohydrogen production from biodiesel solid residues. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 37, 15489-15495.

Kumar, G., Lin, C.Y., 2013. Bioconversion of de-oiled Jatropha Waste (DJW) to hydrogen and methane gas by anaerobic fermentation: Influence of substrate concentration, temperature and pH. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 38, 63-72.

Lay, C.H., Sung, I.Y., Kumar, G., Chu, C.Y., Chen, C.C., Lin, C.Y., 2012. Optimizing biohydrogen production from mushroom cultivation waste using anaerobic mixed cultures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 37, 16473-16478.

Levin, D.B., Pitt, L., Love, M., 2004. Biohydrogen production: prospects and limitations to practical application. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 29, 173-185.

Li, C., Fang, H.H.P., 2007. Fermentative hydrogen production from wastewater and solid wastes by mixed cultures. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Technol. 37, 1-39.

Lin, C.Y., Chang, R.C., 1999. Hydrogen production during the anaerobic acidogenic conversion of glucose. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 74, 498-500.

Lin, C.Y., Hung, C.H., Chen, C.H., Chung, W.T., Cheng, L.H., 2006. Effects of initial cultivation pH on fermentative hydrogen production from xylose using natural mixed cultures. Proc. Biochem. 41, 1383-1390.

Mohammadi, P., Ibrahim, S., Mohamad Annuar, M.S., Law, S., 2011. Effects of different pretreatment methods on anaerobic mixed microflora for hydrogen production and COD reduction from palm oil mill effluent. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 1654-1658.

Mu, Y., Wang, G., Yu, H.Q., 2006. Response surface methodological analysis on biohydrogen production by enriched anaerobic cultures. Enzy. Microb. Technol. 38, 905-913.

Sarma, S.J., Brar, S.K., Le Bihan, Y., Buelna, G., 2013. Bio-hydrogen production by biodiesel-derived crude glycerol bioconversion: A techno-economic evaluation. Bioproc. Biosyst. Eng. 36, 1-10.

Sivagurunathan, P., Sen, B., Lin, C.Y., 2014. Batch fermentative hydrogen production by enriched mixed culture: Combination strategy and their microbial composition. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 117, 222-228.

Sleat, R., Mah, R.A., Robinson, R., 1984. Isolation and characterization of an anaerobic, cellulolytic bacterium, Clostridium cellulovorans sp. nov. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 48, 88-93.

Van Ginkel, S., Sung, S., Lay, J.J., 2001. Biohydrogen production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Env. Sci. Technol. 35, 4726-4730.

Walton, S.L., Bischoff, K.M., Van Heiningen, A.R.P., Van Walsum, G.P., 2010. Production of lactic acid from hemicellulose extracts by Bacillus coagulans MXL-9. J. Indust. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37, 823-830.

Wang, C.H., Lin, P.J., Chang, J.S., 2006. Fermentative conversion of sucrose and pineapple waste into hydrogen gas in phosphate-buffered culture seeded with municipal sewage sludge. Proc. Biochem. 41, 1353-1358.

Wang, J., Wan, W., 2009a. Factors influencing fermentative hydrogen production: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 34, 799-811.

Wang, J., Wan, W., 2009b. Kinetic models for fermentative hydrogen production: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 34, 3313-3323.

Wang, Y.Y., Ai, P., Hu, C.X., Zhang, Y.L., 2011. Effects of various pretreatment methods of anaerobic mixed microflora on biohydrogen production and the fermentation pathway of glucose. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 36, 390-396.

Wang, H., Zhi, Z., Wang, J., Ma, S., 2012. Comparison of various pretreatment methods for biohydrogen production from cornstalk. Bioproc. Biosyst.Eng. 35, 1239-1245.

Wiegel, J., Kuk, S.U., Kohring, G.W., 1989. Clostridium thermobutyricum sp. nov., a moderate thermophile isolated from a cellulolytic culture, that produces butyrate as the major product. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 39, 199-204.