Biofuel Research Journal

Biofuel Research Journal

Comparison of pretreatment methods that enhance biomethane production from crop residues - a systematic review

Document Type : Review Paper

Authors
Reckson Kamusoko 1
Raphael Muzondiwa Jingura 1
Wilson Parawira 2
Walter Tendai Sanyika 1
1 Chinhoyi University of Technology, P. Bag 7724, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe.
2 Bindura University of Science Education, P. Bag 1020, Bindura, Zimbabwe.
10.18331/BRJ2019.6.4.4
Abstract
A systematic literature review was conducted to compare the efficacy of biological, chemical, physical, and combined pretreatments in enhancing biomethane production from crop residues (CR). Three electronic databases viz., Science Direct, EBSCOhost, and PubMed were used to identify the studies in literature. The pretreatment methods were compared in terms of their advantages and disadvantages with reference to techno-economic aspects. The techno-economic aspects considered included rate of hydrolysis, energy use, effectiveness, cost, and formation of toxic compounds. A total of 3167 studies, covering the period 2014 - 2018, were screened for relevance to the study. Forty-four records (n=44) consisting of 36 research papers (n=36) and eight narrative reviews (n=8) met the inclusion criteria. The results show that physical and chemical methods are the most effective and fastest. These methods have limited utility due to high cost of resources, operation, and energy as well as formation of inhibitory by-products. Despite generation of toxic compounds, combined methods are regarded as fast and costeffective. Biological method is inexpensive, eco-friendly, and low energy-consuming. However, it is a nascent technology that is still developing. A combination of trends in research and development provide the best pretreatment alternative to improve the biomethane production from CR.

Graphical Abstract

Comparison of pretreatment methods that enhance biomethane production from crop residues - a systematic review

Highlights

  • Efficacy of biological, chemical, physical and combined pretreatments in enhancing biomethane production from crop residues compared.
  • Physical and chemical pre-treatment methods are the most effective and fastest.
  • Disadvantages of physical and chemical pretreatments are high cost of resources, operation and energy as well as formation of inhibitory byproducts.
  • Combined pretreatment processes are fast and cost effective but have limited utility due to generation of toxic compounds.
  • Biological pretreatment is inexpensive, eco-friendly and low energy- consuming process.

Keywords
Anaerobic digestion
Biogas
Biomethane potential
Feedstock
Organic matter
[1] Achinas, S., Achinas, V., Euverink, G.J.W., 2017. A technological overview of biogas production from biowaste. Engineering. 3(3), 299-307.  
[2] Alhassan, K.A., Abdullahi, B.T., Shah, M.M., 2019. A review on biogas production as the alternative source of fuel. J. Appl. Adv. Res. 4(2), 61-65.  
[3] Amin, R.F., Khalid, H., Zhang, H., Rahman, S., Zhang, R., Liu, G., Chen, C., 2017. Pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion. AMB Express. 7(1), 72.  
[4] Ariunbaatar, J., Panico, A., Esposito, G., Pirozzi, F., Lens, P.N., 2014. Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste. Appl. Energy. 123, 143-156.
[5] Asiksoy, G., 2019. Computer-based concept mapping as a method for enhancing the effectiveness of concept learning in technology-enhanced learning. Sustainability. 11(4), 1005.  
[6] Babaee, A., Shayegan, J., 2011. Effect of organic loading rates (OLR) on production of methane from anaerobic digestion of vegetables waste in proceedings of the world renewable energy congress. Linköping, Sweden.
[7] Baeta, B.E.L., Lima, D.R.S., Adarme, O.F.H., Gurgel, L.V.A., Aguino, S.F., 2016. Optimization of sugarcane bagasse autohydrolysis for methane production from lignocellulosic hydrolyzates in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour. Technol. 200, 137-146.   
[8] Baruah, J., Nath, B.K., Sharma, R., Kumar, S., Deka, R.C., Baruah, D.C., Kalita, E., 2018. Recent trends in the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for value-added products. Front Energy Res. 6, 141.
[9] Bauer, A., Lizasoain, J., Theuretzbacher, F., Agger, J.W., Rincon, M., Menardo, S., Saylor, M.K., Enguídanos, R., Nielsen, P.J., Potthast, A., Zweckmair, T., 2014. Steam explosion pretreatment for enhancing biogas production of late harvested hay. Bioresour. Technol. 166, 403-410.
[10] Byrne, E., Kovacs, K., Van Nielet, E.W., Willquist, K., Svensson, S.E., Kreuger, E., 2018. Reduced phosphorous and water in sequential dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion of wheat straw and the application of ensiled steam-pretreated lucerne as a macronutrient provider in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 11(1), 281.  
[11] Carrerre, H., Antonopoulou, G., Affes, R., Passos, F., Battimelli, A., Lyberatos, G., Ferrer, I., 2016. Review of Feedstock pretreatment strategies for improved anaerobic digestion: from lab-scale research to full-scale application. Bioresour. Technol. 199, 386-397.  
[12] Chandra, R., Hakeuchi, H., Hasegawa, T., Vijay, V.K., 2015. Experimental evaluation of substrate’s particle of wheat and rice straw biomass on methane production yield. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 17(2), 93-104.
[13] Chen, S., Jang, J., Wang, X., 2015. Effects of alkalinity sources on the stability of anaerobic digestion from food waste. Waste Manage. Res. 33(11), 1033-1040.
[14] Chen, X.L., Han, Y.X., Zhang, C.M., Feng, G.Q., Zhao, M.X., Yue, R.X., Li, Y.F., Jiang, L., Zhang, L., Li, J.H., Li, S.Z., 2017. Alkaline pretreatment of banana stems for methane generation: effects of temperature and physico-chemical changes. BioResources. 12(3), 56015616.
[15] Constant, S., Barakat, A., Robitzer, M., Di Renzo, F., Dumas, C., Quignard, F., 2016. Composition, texture and methane potential of cellulosic residues from Lewis acids organosolv pulping of wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 216, 737-743.
[16] Dahunsi, S.O., 2019. Mechanical pretreatment of lignocelluloses for enhanced production: methane yield prediction from biomass structural components. Biresour. Technol. 280, 18-26.
[17] Demirbas, M.F., Balat, M., 2009. Progress and recent trends in biogas processing. Int. J. Green Energy. 6(2), 117-142.
[18] Den, W., Sharma, V.K., Lee, M., Nadadur, G., Varma, R.S., 2018. Lignocellulosic biomass transformations via greener oxidative pretreatment processes: access to energy and valueadded chemicals. Front. Chem. 6, 141.  
[19] Dumas, C., Ghizzi, G.S.G., Barakat, A., Carrere, H., Steyer, J.P., Rouau, X., 2015. Effects of grinding processes on anaerobic digestion of wheat straw. Ind. Crops Prod. 74, 450-456.
[20] Eskicioglu, C., Monlau, F., Barakat, A., Ferrer, I., Kaparaju, P., Trably, E., Carrere, H., 2017. Assessment of hydrothermal pretreatment of various lignocellulosic biomass with CO2 catalyst for enhanced methane and hydrogen production. Water Res. 120, 32-42.
[21] Esposito, G., Frunzo, L., Liotta, F., Panico, A., Pirozzi, F., 2012. Biomethane potential tests to measure the biogas production from the digestion and co-digestion of complex organic substrates. Open Environ. Eng. J. 5, 1-8.  
[22] Fitzgerald, G.C., 2013. Pre-processing and treatment of municipal solid waste (MSW) prior to incineration, in: Klinghoffer, N.B., Castaldi, M.J. (Eds.), Waste to Energy Conversion Technology. Woodhead Publishing Limited, pp. 55-71.
[23] Forbes, C.A., Deshpande, S., Sorio-Vilela, F., Kutikova, L., Duffy, S., Gouni-Berthold, I., Hagstrom, E., 2018. A systematic literature review comparing methods for the measurement of patient persistence and adherence. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 34(9), 1613-1625.
[24] Gaworski, M., Jablonski, S., Pawlaczyk-Graja, I., Ziewiecki, R., Rutkowski, P., Wieczynska, A., Gancarz, R., Łukaszewicz, M., 2017. Enhancement of biogas plant production using pig manure and corn silage by adding wheat straw processed with liquid hot water and steam explosion. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 10, 259.  
[25] Ge, X., Xu, F., Li, Y., 2016. Solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: recent progress and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 205, 239-249.
[26] Gould, M.C., 2015. Bioenergy and anaerobic digestion, in: Dahiya, A. (Ed.), Bioenergy: Biomass to Biofuels. Elsevier, pp. 297-317.
[27] Gumisiriza, R., Hawumba, J.F., Okure, M., Hensel, O., 2017. Biomass waste-to-energy valorisation technologies: a review case for banana processing in Uganda. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 10, 11.  
[28] Hagos, K., Zong, J., Li, D., Liu, C., Lu, X., 2017. Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: progress, challenges and perspectives. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 76, 1485-1496.
[29] Horváth, I.S., Tabatabaei, M., Karimi, K., Kumar, R., 2016. Recent updates on biogas production-a review. Biofuel Res. J. 10, 394-402.   
[30] Hua, B., Dai, J., Liu, B., Zhang, H., Yuan, X., Wang, X., Cui, Z., 2016. Pretreatment of non-sterile, rotted silage maize straw by the microbial community MC1 increases biogas production. Bioresour. Technol. 216, 699-705.
[31] Ismail, S., Saharuddin, M.Q., Zahari, M.S.M., 2017. Upgraded seawater-alkaline pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for bio-methane production. Energy Procedia. 138, 372-379.
[32] Jingura, R.M., Kamusoko, R., 2017. Methods for determination of biomethane potential of feedstocks: a review. Biofuel Res. J. 4(2), 573-586.   
[33] Karrupiah, T., Azariah, V.E., 2019. Biomass pretreatment for enhancement of production. IntechOpen.  
[34] Kigozi, R., Muzenda, E., Aboyade, A.O., 2014. Biogas technology, current trends, opportunities and challenges, in: 6th International Conference on Green Technology, Renewable Energy & Environmental Engineering. Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 27-28.
[35] Kim, D., Kim, J., Lee, C., 2018. Effect of mild-temperature thermo-alkaline pretreatment on solubilization and anaerobic digestion of spent coffee grains. Energies. 11(4), 865.  
[36] Kitchenham, B., Charters, S., 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report. Keele University, UK and University of Durham, UK.
[37] Kostas, E.T., Beneroso, D., Robinson, J.P., 2017. The application of microwave heating in bioenergy: a review of the microwave pretreatment and upgrading technologies for biomass. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 77, 12-27.
[38] Kougias, P.G., Angelidaki, I., 2018. Biogas and its opportunities-a review. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 12(3), 14.
[39] Kudanga, T., Le Roes-Hill, M., 2014. Laccase applications in biofuel production: current status and future prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98(15), 6525-6542.
[40] Kumar, A.K., Sharma, S., 2017. Recent updates on different methods of pretreatment of lignocellusic feedstocks: a review. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 4(1), 7.  
[41] Kumar, S., Paritosh, K., Pareek, N., Chawade, A., Vivekanand, V., 2018. De-construction of major Indian cereal crop residues through chemical pretreatment for improved biogas production: an overview. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 90, 160-170.
[42] Kwietniewska, E., Tys, J., 2014. Process characteristics, inhibition factors and methane yields of anaerobic digestion process, with particular focus on microalgal biomass fermentation. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 34, 491-500.
[43] Li, C., Liu, G., Nges, I.A., Deng, L., Nistor, M., Liu, J., 2016. Fresh banana pseudo-stems as a tropical lignocellulosic feedstock for methane production. Energy Sustain. Soc. 6,27.  
[44] Li, X., Dang, F., Zhnag, Y., Zou, D., Yuan, H., 2015. Anaerobic digestion performance and mechanism of ammoniation pretreatment of corn stover. BioRes. 10(3), 5777-5790.
[45] Liu, T., Zhou, X., Li, Z., Wang, X., Sun, J., 2019. Effects of liquid digestate pretreatment on biogas production for anaerobic digestion of wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 280, 345351.
[46] Luo, T., Long, Y., Li, J., Meng, X., Mei, Z., Long, E., Dai, B., 2015. Performance of a novel downward plug-flow anaerobic digester for methane production from chopped straw. BioRes. 10(1), 943-955.
[47] Mahood, Q., Eerd, D.V., Irvin, E., 2014. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits. Res. Synth. Methods. 5(3), 221-234.
[48] Mittal, S., Ahlgren, E.O., Shukla, P.R., 2018. Barriers to biogas dissemination in India. Energy Policy. 112, 361-370.
[49] Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J et al., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Br. Med. J. 339, b2535.   
[50] Montgomery, L.F.R., Bochmann, G., 2014. Pretreatment of feedstock for enhanced production. Technical Brochure. IEA Bioenergy.
[51] Mulakhudair, A.R., Hanotu, J., Zimmerman, W., 2016. Exploiting microbubble-microbe synergy for biomass processing: application in lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment. Biomass Bioenergy. 93, 187-193.
[52] Mulat, D.G., Horn, S.J., 2018. Biogas production from lignin via anaerobic digestion, in: Beckham, G.T. (Ed.), Lignin Valorization: Emerging Approaches, Energy and Environment, series no. 19., Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 391-412.
[53] Mustafa, A.M., Li, H., Radwan, A.A., Sheng, K., Chen, X., 2018. Effect of hydrothermal and Ca(OH)2 pretreatments on anaerobic digestion of sugarcane bagasse for biogas production. Bioresour. Technol. 259, 54-60.
[54] Muzenda, E., 2014. Bio-methane generation from organic waste: a review, in: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, vol II. San Fransisco, USA.
[55] Nair, R.B., Kabir, M.M., Lennartsson, P.R., Taherzadeh, M.J., Horvath, I.S., 2018. Integrated process for ethanol, biogas and edible filamentous fungi-based animal feed production from dilute phosphoric acid-pretreated wheat straw. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 184(1), 48-62.
[56] Okoli, C., Schabram, K., 2010. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems. 10(26).
[57] Oszust, K., Pawlik, A., Janusz, G., Zieminski, K., Cyran, M., Siczek, A., Gryta, A., Bilińska-Wielgus, N., Frąc, M., 2017. Characterization and influence of a multi-enzymatic biopreparation for biogas yield enhancement. BioRes. 12(3), 6187-6206.
[58] Paez, A., 2017. Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. J. Evid. Based Med.10, 233-240.
[59] Påledal, S.N., Moestedt, J., Nordell, E., 2013. The importance of complex nutrient solution in biochemical methane potential tests to achieve more reliable results, in: Proceedings of the 13th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion, Santiago de Compostella.  
[60] Patinvoh, R.J., Osadolor, O.A., Chandolias, K., Horvath, S., Taherzadeh, M.J., 2017. Innovative pretreatment strategies for biogas production. Bioresour. Technol. 224, 13-24.
[61] Paul, S., Dutta, A., Defersha, F., 2018. Mechanical and alkaline hydrothermal treated corn residue conversion into bio-energy and bio-fertilizer: a resource recovery concept. Energies. 11(3), 516.  
[62] Pei, P., Zhang, C., Li, J., Chang, S., Li, S., Wang, J., Zhao, M et al., 2014. Optimization of NaOH pretreatment for enhancement of biogas production of banana pseudo-stem fiber using response surface methodology. BioRes. 9(3), 5073-5087.
[63] Perendeci, N.A., Gokgol, S., Orhon, D., 2018. Impact of alkaline H2O2 pretreatment on methane generation potential of greenhouse crop waste under anaerobic conditions. Molecules. 23, 1794.  
[64] Prasad, S., Rathore, D., Singh, A., 2017. Recent advances in biogas production. Chem. Engin. Process Tech. 3(2), 1038.
[65] Rabii, A., Aldin, S., Dahman, Y., Elbeshbishy, E., 2019. A review of anaerobic codigestion with a focus on the microbial populations and the effect of multi-stage digester configuration. Energies. 12, 1106.  
[66] Rouches, E., Dignac, M., Zhou, S., Carrere, H., 2017. Pyrolysis-GC-MS to assess the fungal pretreatment efficiency for wheat straw anaerobic digestion. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 123, 409-418.
[67] Sadhukhan, J., Martinez-Hernandez, E., Murphy, R.J., Ng, D. Ks., Hassim, M.H., Ng, K.S., Kin, W.Y et al., 2018. Role of bioenergy, biorefinery and bioeconomy in sustainable development: strategic pathways for Malaysia. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 81(2), 1966-1987.  
[68] Sahito, A.R., Mahar, R.B., 2014. Enhancing methane production from rice straw codigested with buffalo dung by optimising effect of substrate ratio, alkaline dose and particle size. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 24(4), 1076-1084.
[69] Sahito, A.R., Mahar, R.B, Brohi, K.M., 2013. Anaerobic biodegradability and methane potential of crop residue co-digested with buffalo dung. Res. J.  Eng. Technol. 32(3), 509-518.
[70] Sambusiti, C., 2013. Physical, chemical and biological pretreatment to enhance biogas production from lignocellulosic substrates. Dissertation. Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
[71] Sell, S.T., Burns, R.T., Raman, D.R., Moody, L.B., 2010. Approaches for selecting anaerobic digestion co-substrates for a full-scale beef manure digester using biochemical methane potentials and anaerobic toxicity assays, in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Air Quality and Manure Management for Agriculture. Dallas, Texas.  
[72] Sepehri, A., Sarrafzadeh, M., 2018. Effects of nitrifiers community on fouling mitigation and nitrification efficiency in a membrane bioreactor. Chem. Eng. Process. 128,10-18.
[73] Sepehri, A., Sarrafzadeh, M., 2019. Activity of enhancement of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge process: metabolite reduction and CO2 mitigation intensification process. Appl. Water. Sci. 9, 131.
[74] Sindhu, R., Binod, P., Pandey, A., 2016. Biological pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass- An overview. Bioresour. Technol. 199, 76-82.
[75] Singh, S., Harms, H., Schlosser, D., 2014. Screening of ecologically diverse fungi for their potential to pretreat lignocellulosic bioenergy feedstock. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98(7), 3355-3370.
[76] Song, Z., Yang, G., Liu, X., Yan, Z., Yuan, Y., Liao, Y., 2014. Comparison of seven chemical pretreatments of corn straw for improving methane yield by anaerobic digestion. PLoS One. 9(4), e93801.
[77] Speda, J., Johansson, M.A., Odnell, A., Karlsson, M., 2017. Enhanced bio-methane production rate and yield from lignocellulosic ensiled forage ley by in situ anaerobic digestion treatment with endogenous cellulolytic enzymes. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 10,129.
[78] Sträuber, H., Bühligen, F., Kleinsteuber, S., Nikolausz, M., Porsch, K., 2015. Improved anaerobic fermentation of wheat straw by alkaline pretreatment and addition of alkali tolerant microorganisms. Bioengineering. 2(2), 66-93.
[79] Strong, P.J., Kalyuzhnaya, M., Silverman, J., Clarke, W.P., 2016.A methanotroph-based biorefinery: scenarios for generating multiple products from a single culture. Bioresour. Technol. 215, 314-323.
[80] Talha, Z., Ding, W., Mehryar, E., Hassan, M., Bi, J., 2016. Alkaline pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse and filter mud co-digested to improve bio-methane production. BioMed. Res. Int. 8650597, 10.
[81] Theuretzbacher, F., Lizasoain, J., Lefever, C., Saylor, M.K., Enquidanos, R., Weran, N., Gronauer, A et al.,  2015. Steam explosion pretreatment of wheat straw to improve methane yields: Investigation of the degradation kinetics of structural compounds during anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 179, 299-305.
[82] Thomas, H.L., Seira, J., Escudié, R., Carrére, H., 2018. Lime pretreatment of miscanthus: impact on BMP and batch dry co-digestion with cattle manure. Molecules. 23(7), 1608.
[83] Thomsen, S.T., Londono, J.E.G., Ambye-Jensen, M., Heiske, S., Kadar, Z., Meyer, A.S., 2016. Combination of ensiling and fungal delignification as effective wheat straw pretreatment. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 9,16.
[84] Triolo, J.M., Ward, A.J., Pedersen, L., Pederson, L., Sommer, S.G., 2013. Characteristics of animal slurry as a key biomass for biogas production in Denmark, in: Matovic, M.D. (Ed.), Biomass Now - Sustainable Growth and Use. Intech, pp. 307-326.
[85] Venturin, B., Frumi, C.A., Scapini, T., Mulinari, J., Bonatto, C., Bazoti, S., Pereira, S.D et al., 2018. Effect of pretreatments on corn stalk chemical properties for biogas production purposes. Bioresour. Technol. 266, 116-124.
[86] Wagner, A.O., Lackner, N., Mutschlechner, M., Prem, E.M., Markt, R., IIImer, P., 2018. Biological pretreatment strategies for second-generation lignocellulosic resources to enhance biogas production. Energies. 11, 1797.
[87] Wang, J., 2014. Decentralized biogas technology of anaerobic digestion and farm ecosystem: opportunities and challenges. Front. Energy Res.
[88] WBA: World Bioenergy Association, 2018. WBA Global Bioenergy Statistics 2018.
[89] Weiland, P., 2010. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol.  Biotechnol. 85, 849-860.  
[90] Wikandari, R., Nguyen, H., Millati, R., Niklasson, C., Taherzadeh, M.J., 2014. Improvement of biogas production from orange peel waste by leaching of limonene. BioMed. Res. Int. 494182, 6.
[91] Wu, C., Zhou, H., Yang, F., Zhang, Y., Gao, F., 2015. Microwave pretreatment of switchgrass leaf and stem fractions to increase methane production. BioRes. 10(3), 3922-3933.
[92] Xi, Y., Chang, Z., Ye, X., Du, J., Chen, G., Xu, Y., 2015. Enhanced methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of wheat straw and herbal-extraction processing residues. BioRes. 10(4), 7985-7997.
[93] Yao, Y., Chen, S., 2016. A novel and simple approach to the good performance of methane recovery from lignocellulosic biomass alone. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 9,115.
[94] Yuan, H., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Meng, Y., Liu, C., Zou, D., Liu, Y., 2014. Effects of ammoniation pretreatment at low moisture content on anaerobic digestion performance of rice straw. BioRes. 9(4), 6707-6718.  
[95] Zhang, H., Ning, Z., Khalid, H., Zhang, R., Liu, G., Chen, C., 2018. Enhancement of methane production from cotton stalk using different pretreatment techniques. Sci. Rep. 8, 3463.
[96] Zheng, Y., Zhao, J., Xu, F., Li, Y., 2014. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 42, 35-53.
[97] Zieminski, K., Kowalska-Wentel, M., 2017. Effects of different sugar beet pulp pretreatments on biogas production efficiency. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 181(3), 12111227.
Biofuel Research Journal
Volume 6, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
Autumn 2019
Pages 1080-1089