Biofuel Research Journal

Biofuel Research Journal

Thermochemical pathways coupled with carbon capture for valorizing animal manure: A review

Document Type : Review Paper

Authors
1 Circular Process Engineering Laboratory, Department of Process Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
2 Environmental Research and Sustainability Division, Malus Ecolife Inc., Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
3 School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University Kingston, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
4 Department of Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada.
5 Department of Industrial Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
6 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
7 Department of Animal Science & Aquaculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Abstract
Livestock manure is a significant source of methane and nitrous oxide emissions, posing serious environmental challenges. While conventional management often exacerbates these impacts, thermochemical technologies such as pyrolysis, gasification, and hydrothermal processing offer promising pathways to convert manure into energy, biochar, and other valuable products within a circular bioeconomy. However, these processes can still emit carbon, limiting their environmental benefits. Integrating carbon capture technologies can mitigate these emissions, enabling net-negative outcomes and enhancing overall energy efficiency. This review explores the technical, economic, and environmental aspects of thermochemical manure valorization and emphasizes the transformative potential of coupling these processes with carbon capture. Combustion and co-firing reduce greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels, but are hindered by manure’s high ash and moisture content. Advanced thermochemical methods such as pyrolysis and gasification yield biochar, bio-oil, and syngas, yet face similar limitations. Hydrothermal processing, especially hydrothermal liquefaction and carbonization, effectively addresses moisture-related challenges and is particularly effective for pig manure. Catalytic gasification further improves conversion efficiency and product quality but remains costly due to expensive catalysts and process complexity. Evidence suggests that integrating carbon capture with thermochemical conversion offers a viable solution for achieving net-negative emissions. However, the widespread deployment of these integrated systems is constrained by high capital costs and infrastructure requirements. Realizing their full potential requires targeted investment, technological innovation, and robust policy support to overcome existing barriers and drive scalable, sustainable implementation.

Graphical Abstract

Thermochemical pathways coupled with carbon capture for valorizing animal manure: A review

Highlights

  • Livestock growth drives increased manure, posing serious environmental challenges.
  • Thermochemical processes provide an effective solution for manure management.
  • Manure combustion generates a lower energy value vs. advanced thermochemical methods.
  • Carbon capture systems boost thermochemical manure processes, but challenges persist.
  • Thermochemical manure processing shows strong economic and environmental potential.

Keywords

  1. Adar, E., Karatop, B., Ince, M., Bilgili, M.S., 2016. Comparison of methods for sustainable energy management with sewage sludge in Turkey based on SWOT-FAHP analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 62, 429–440.
  2. Adeleke, A.A., Adedigba, A., Adeshina, S.A., Ikubanni, P.P., Lawal, M.S., Olosho, A.I., Yakubu, H.S., Ogedengbe, T.S., Nzerem, P., Okolie, J.A., 2024. Comparative studies of machine learning models for predicting higher heating values of biomass. Digit. Chem. Eng. 12, 100159.
  3. Aguirre-Villegas, H.A., Larson, R.A., 2017. Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management practices using survey data and lifecycle tools. Clean. Prod. 143, 169–179.
  4. Al-Rumaihi, A., Parthasarathy, P., Fernandez, A., Al-Ansari, T., Mackey, H.R., Rodriguez, R., Mazza, G., McKay, G., 2021. Thermal degradation characteristics and kinetic study of camel manure pyrolysis. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9(5), 106071.
  5. Alaedini, A.H., Tourani, H.K., Saidi, M., 2023. A review of waste-to-hydrogen conversion technologies for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) applications: Aspect of gasification process and catalyst development. J. Environ. Manage. 329, 117077.
  6. Ali, B., Shah, G.A., Traore, B., Shah, S.A.A., Shah, S. ul S., Al-Solaimani, S.G.M., Hussain, Q., Ali, N., Shahzad, K., Shahzad, T., Ahmad, A., Muhammad, S., Shah, G.M., Arshad, M., Hussain, R.A., Shah, J.A., Anwar, A., Amjid, M.W., Rashid, M.I., 2019. Manure storage operations mitigate nutrient losses and their products can sustain soil fertility and enhance wheat productivity. J. Environ. Manage. 241, 468–478.
  7. Annamalai, K., Thien, B., Sweeten, J., 2003. Co-firing of coal and cattle feedlot biomass (FB) fuels. Part II. Performance results from 30 kWt (100,000) BTU/h laboratory scale boiler burner. Fuel 82(10), 1183–1193.
  8. Arauzo, P.J., Maziarka, P.A., Olszewski, M.P., Isemin, R.L., Muratova, N.S., Ronsse, F., Kruse, A., 2020. Valorization of the poultry litter through wet torrefaction and different activation treatments. Total Environ. 732, 139288.
  9. Atienza-Martínez, M., Ábrego, J., Gea, G., Marías, F., 2020. Pyrolysis of dairy cattle manure: evolution of char characteristics. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 145, 104724.
  10. Ba, S., Qu, Q., Zhang, K., Groot, J.C.J., 2020. Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from dairy manure composting. Biosyst. Eng. 193, 126–137.
  11. Babaei, K., Bozorg, A., Tavasoli, A., 2021. Hydrogen-rich gas production through supercritical water gasification of chicken manure over activated carbon/ceria-based nickel catalysts. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 159, 105318.
  12. Babinszki, B., Sebestyén, Z., Jakab, E., Kőhalmi, L., Bozi, J., Várhegyi, G., Wang, L., Skreiberg, Czégény, Z., 2021. Effect of slow pyrolysis conditions on biocarbon yield and properties: Characterization of the volatiles. Bioresour. Technol. 338, 125567.
  13. Bora, R.R., Lei, M., Tester, J.W., Lehmann, J., You, F., 2020. Life Cycle Assessment and Technoeconomic Analysis of Thermochemical Conversion Technologies Applied to Poultry Litter with Energy and Nutrient Recovery. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8(22), 8436–8447.
  14. Bortolini, S., Macavei, L.I., Hadj Saadoun, J., Foca, G., Ulrici, A., Bernini, F., Malferrari, D., Setti, L., Ronga, D., Maistrello, L., 2020. Hermetia illucens (L.) larvae as chicken manure management tool for circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 262, 121289.
  15. Burg, V., Bowman, G., Haubensak, M., Baier, U., Thees, O., 2018. Valorization of an untapped resource: Energy and greenhouse gas emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas through anaerobic digestion. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 136, 53–62.
  16. Cantrell, K.B., Hunt, P.G., Uchimiya, M., Novak, J.M., Ro, K.S., 2012. Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 107, 419–428.
  17. Cao, L., Zhang, C., Chen, H., Tsang, D.C.W., Luo, G., Zhang, S., Chen, J., 2017. Hydrothermal liquefaction of agricultural and forestry wastes: state-of-the-art review and future prospects. Bioresour. Technol. 245, 1184–1193.
  18. Cao, W., Cao, C., Guo, L., Jin, H., Dargusch, M., Bernhardt, D., Yao, X., 2016. Hydrogen production from supercritical water gasification of chicken manure. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41(48), 22722–22731.
  19. Cao, W., Wei, W., Jin, H., Yi, L., Wang, L., 2022. Optimize hydrogen production from chicken manure gasification in supercritical water by experimental and kinetics study. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10(3), 107591.
  20. Cavali, M., Libardi Junior, N., de Sena, J.D., Woiciechowski, A.L., Soccol, C.R., Belli Filho, P., Bayard, R., Benbelkacem, H., de Castilhos Junior, A.B., 2023. A review on hydrothermal carbonization of potential biomass wastes, characterization and environmental applications of hydrochar, and biorefinery perspectives of the process. Total Environ. 857, 159627.
  21. Cely, P., Gascó, G., Paz-Ferreiro, J., Méndez, A., 2015. Agronomic properties of biochars from different manure wastes. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 111, 173–182.
  22. Chai, Y., Packham, N., Wang, M., 2022. Process improvement analysis of pyrolysis/gasification of biomass and waste plastics with carbon capture and utilisation through process simulation. Fuel 324, 124571.
  23. Chao, C., Deng, Y., Dewil, R., Baeyens, J., Fan, X., 2021. Post-combustion carbon capture. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 138, 110490
  24. Chen, H., Awasthi, S.K., Liu, T., Duan, Y., Ren, X., Zhang, Z., Pandey, A., Awasthi, M.K., 2020. Effects of microbial culture and chicken manure biochar on compost maturity and greenhouse gas emissions during chicken manure composting. J. Hazard. Mater. 389, 121908.
  25. Chen, W.H., Lin, B.J., Lin, Y.Y., Chu, Y.S., Ubando, A.T., Show, P.L., Ong, H.C., Chang, J.S., Ho, S.H., Culaba, A.B., Pétrissans, A., Pétrissans, M., 2021. Progress in biomass torrefaction: Principles, applications and challenges. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 82, 100887.
  26. Chen, W.H., Peng, J., Bi, X.T., 2015. A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 44, 847–866.
  27. Chen, Y., Yang, H., Yang, Q., Hao, H., Zhu, B., Chen, H., 2014. Torrefaction of agriculture straws and its application on biomass pyrolysis poly-generation. Bioresour. Technol. 156, 70–77.
  28. Cheng, F., Small, A.A., Colosi, L.M., 2021. The levelized cost of negative CO2 emissions from thermochemical conversion of biomass coupled with carbon capture and storage. Energy Convers. Manag. 237, 114115.
  29. Conti, F., Toor, S.S., Pedersen, T.H., Seehar, T.H., Nielsen, A.H., Rosendahl, L.A., 2020. Valorization of animal and human wastes through hydrothermal liquefaction for biocrude production and simultaneous recovery of nutrients. Energy Convers. Manag. 216, 112925.
  30. da Cruz, T.T., Balestieri, J.A.P., de Toledo Silva, J.M., Vilanova, M.R.N., Oliveira, O.J., Ávila, I., 2021. Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage/utilization: From current state to future research directions and opportunities. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 108, 103309.
  31. Dai, L., Yang, B., Li, H., Tan, F., Zhu, N., Zhu, Q., He, M., Ran, Y., Hu, G., 2017. A synergistic combination of nutrient reclamation from manure and resultant hydrochar upgradation by acid-supported hydrothermal carbonization. Technol. 243, 860–866.
  32. De Vries, J.W., Groenestein, C.M., De Boer, I.J.M., 2012. Environmental consequences of processing manure to produce mineral fertilizer and bio-energy. J. Environ. Manage. 102, 173–183.
  33. Di Gregorio, F., Santoro, D., Arena, U., 2014. The effect of ash composition on gasification of poultry wastes in a fluidized bed reactor. Waste Manag. Res. 32(4), 323–330.
  34. Dimitriadis, A., Bezergianni, S., 2017. Hydrothermal liquefaction of various biomass and waste feedstocks for biocrude production: A state of the art review. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68, 113–125.
  35. Dos Passos, J.S., Matayeva, A., Biller, P., 2022. Synergies during hydrothermal liquefaction of cow manure and wheat straw. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10(5), 108181.
  36. Du, M., Liu, S., Sun, J., Jin, H., Chen, Y., Guo, L., 2023. Clean conversion of pig manure via supercritical water gasification: Hydrogen-enriched syngas generation, mechanisms analysis, and environmental impacts. J. Clean. Prod. 420, 138455.
  37. Durak, H., 2023. Comprehensive assessment of thermochemical processes for sustainable waste management and resource recovery. Process. 11(7), 2092.
  38. Elliott, D.C., Biller, P., Ross, A.B., Schmidt, A.J., Jones, S.B., 2015. Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: Developments from batch to continuous process. Bioresour. Technol. 178, 147–156.
  39. Elsgaard, L., Olsen, A.B., Petersen, S.O., 2016. Temperature response of methane production in liquid manures and co-digestates. Sci. Total Environ. 539, 78–84.
  40. Erlach, B., Harder, B., Tsatsaronis, G., 2012. Combined hydrothermal carbonization and gasification of biomass with carbon capture. Energy 45(1), 329–338.
  41. Esteves, E.M.M., Herrera, A.M.N., Esteves, V.P.P., Morgado, C. do R.V., 2019. Life cycle assessment of manure biogas production: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 219, 411–423.
  42. Fan, Y., Hornung, U., Dahmen, N., 2022. Hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge for biofuel application: A review on fundamentals, current challenges and strategies. Biomass Bioenergy 165, 106570
  43. FAO, 2025. FAOSTAT.
  44. FAO, 2018. The future of food and agriculture: alternative pathways to 2050. Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome 60.
  45. Fedyaeva, O.N., Morozov, S. V., Vostrikov, A.A., 2023. Supercritical water gasification of chicken manure continuously supplied into the reactor. J. Supercrit. Fluids 200, 105998.
  46. Feng, X., Smith, W., VanderZaag, A.C., 2023. Dairy manure nutrient recovery reduces greenhouse gas emissions and transportation cost in a modeling study. Front. Anim. Sci. 4, 1134817.
  47. Feng, Z. tian, Xiong, J. bo, Wang, G. feng, Li, L., Zhou, C. fei, Zhou, C. huo, Huang, H. jun, 2024. Treatment of swine manure by hydrothermal carbonization: The influential effect and preliminary mechanism of surfactants. Total Environ. 946, 174233.
  48. Fernandez-Lopez, M., López-González, D., Puig-Gamero, M., Valverde, J.L., Sanchez-Silva, L., 2016a. CO2 gasification of dairy and swine manure: A life cycle assessment approach. Energy 95, 552–560.
  49. Fernandez-Lopez, M., Pedrosa-Castro, G.J., Valverde, J.L., Sanchez-Silva, L., 2016b. Kinetic analysis of manure pyrolysis and combustion processes. Waste Manag. 58, 230–240.
  50. Fernandez-Lopez, M., Puig-Gamero, M., Lopez-Gonzalez, D., Avalos-Ramirez, A., Valverde, J., Sanchez-Silva, L., 2015. Life cycle assessment of swine and dairy manure: Pyrolysis and combustion processes. Bioresour. Technol. 182, 184–192.
  51. Gao, Y., Liu, Y., Zhu, G., Xu, J., xu, H., Yuan, Q., Zhu, Y., Sarma, J., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Ji, L., 2018. Microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of dairy manure: Chemical and structural properties of the products. Energy 165, 662–672.
  52. Gascó, G., Paz-Ferreiro, J., Álvarez, M.L., Saa, A., Méndez, A., 2018. Biochars and hydrochars prepared by pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonisation of pig manure. Waste Manag. 79, 395–403.
  53. Genedy, R.A., Ogejo, J.A., 2021. Using machine learning techniques to predict liquid dairy manure temperature during storage. Comput. Electron. Agric. 187, 106234.
  54. Ghadge, R., Nagwani, N., Saxena, N., Dasgupta, S., Sapre, A., 2022. Design and scale-up challenges in hydrothermal liquefaction process for biocrude production and its upgradation. Energy Convers. Manag. X 14, 100223.
  55. Ghiat, I., AlNouss, A., McKay, G., Al-Ansari, T., 2020. Biomass-based integrated gasification combined cycle with post-combustion CO2 recovery by potassium carbonate: Techno-economic and environmental analysis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 135, 106758.
  56. Gizaw, D.G., Periyasamy, S., Baylie, H., Tassew Redda, Z., Asaithambi, P., Jayakumar, M., Baskar, G., Pugazhendhi, A., 2024. Advances in solid biofuels production through torrefaction: Potential biomass, types of torrefaction and reactors, influencing process parameters and future opportunities – A review. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 186, 1307–1319.
  57. Goldfarb, J.L., Hubble, A.H., Ma, Q., Volpe, M., Severini, G., Andreottola, G., Fiori, L., 2022. Valorization of cow manure via hydrothermal carbonization for phosphorus recovery and adsorbents for water treatment. J. Environ. Manage. 308, 114561.
  58. Gollakota, A.R.K., Kishore, N., Gu, S., 2018. A review on hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 1378–1392.
  59. Grande, L., Pedroarena, I., Korili, S.A., Gil, A., 2021. Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass as one of the most promising alternatives for the synthesis of advanced liquid biofuels: a review. Mater. 14(18), 5286.
  60. Guo, S., Ren, C., Wang, Y., Liu, S., Du, M., Chen, Y., Guo, L., 2021. Thermodynamic modeling and analysis of the heat integration and power generation in pig manure supercritical water gasification system. Energy Convers. Manag. 248, 114809.
  61. Gürel, B., Kurtuluş, K., Yurdakul, S., Karaca Dolgun, G., Akman, R., Önür, M.E., Varol, M., Keçebaş, A., Gürbüz, H., 2024. Combustion of chicken manure and Turkish lignite mixtures in a circulating fluidized bed. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 189, 113960.
  62. Hassan, N.S., Jalil, A.A., Hitam, C.N.C., Vo, D.V.N., Nabgan, W., 2020. Biofuels and renewable chemicals production by catalytic pyrolysis of cellulose: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020 185 18(5), 1625–1648.
  63. He, S., Wang, J., Cheng, Z., Dong, H., Yan, B., Chen, G., 2021a. Synergetic effect and primary reaction network of corn cob and cattle manure in single and mixed hydrothermal liquefaction. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 155, 105076.
  64. He, Y., Zhu, L., Fan, J., Li, L., Liu, G., 2021b. Life cycle assessment of CO2 emission reduction potential of carbon capture and utilization for liquid fuel and power cogeneration. Fuel Process. Technol. 221, 106924.
  65. He, X., Hu, Q., Chen, J., Leong, W.Q., Dai, Y., Wang, C.H., 2022. Energy and environmental risk assessments of poultry manure sustainable solution: An industrial case study in Singapore. J. Clean. Prod. 339, 130787.
  66. He, S., Wang, S., Wang, J., Abbas, Z., Yan, B., Chen, G., Cheng, Z., 2024. Study on synergistic effect and reaction pathway in the co-hydrothermal liquefaction of cattle manure and corn cob based on principal component analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 186, 107264.
  67. Heidari, M., Dutta, A., Acharya, B., Mahmud, S., 2019. A review of the current knowledge and challenges of hydrothermal carbonization for biomass conversion. J. Energy Inst. 92(6), 1779–1799.
  68. Hejna, M., Świechowski, K., Rasaq, W.A., Białowiec, A., 2022. Study on the effect of hydrothermal carbonization parameters on fuel properties of chicken manure hydrochar. Materials (Basel). 15(16), 5564.
  69. Hoang, A.T., Huang, Z.H., Nižetić, S., Pandey, A., Nguyen, X.P., Luque, R., Ong, H.C., Said, Z., Le, T.H., Pham, V.V., 2022. Characteristics of hydrogen production from steam gasification of plant-originated lignocellulosic biomass and its prospects in Vietnam. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47(7), 4394–4425.
  70. Hong, W.Y., 2022. A techno-economic review on carbon capture, utilisation and storage systems for achieving a net-zero CO2 emissions future. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 3, 100044.
  71. Hossain, M.Z., Bahar, M.M., Sarkar, B., Donne, S.W., Wade, P., Bolan, N., 2021. Assessment of the fertilizer potential of biochars produced from slow pyrolysis of biosolid and animal manures. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 155, 105043.
  72. Hoyos-Sebá, J.J., Arias, N.P., Salcedo-Mendoza, J., Aristizábal-Marulanda, V., 2024. Animal manure in the context of renewable energy and value-added products: A review. Chem. Eng. Process. - Process Intensif. 196, 109660.
  73. Hu, M., Guo, K., Zhou, H., Zhu, W., Deng, L., Dai, L., 2024. Techno-economic assessment of swine manure biochar production in large-scale piggeries in China. Energy 308, 133037.
  74. Hu, Y., Gong, M., Xing, X., Wang, H., Zeng, Y., Xu, C.C., 2020. Supercritical water gasification of biomass model compounds: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 118, 109529.
  75. Huang, Y., Zou, J., Zheng, X., Wang, Y., Xu, X., 2004. Nitrous oxide emissions as influenced by amendment of plant residues with different C:N ratios. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36(6), 973–981.
  76. Hussein, M.S., Burra, K.G., Amano, R.S., Gupta, A.K., 2017. Temperature and gasifying media effects on chicken manure pyrolysis and gasification. Fuel 202, 36–45.
  77. Idrees, M., Batool, S., Kalsoom, T., Yasmeen, S., Kalsoom, A., Raina, S., Zhuang, Q., Kong, J., 2018. Animal manure-derived biochars produced via fast pyrolysis for the removal of divalent copper from aqueous media. Environ. Manage. 213, 109–118.
  78. Ipiales, R.P., Mohedano, A.F., Diaz-Portuondo, E., Diaz, E., de la Rubia, M.A., 2023. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of swine manure and lignocellulosic waste: A new strategy for the integral valorization of biomass wastes. Waste Manag. 169, 267–275.
  79. Ipiales, R.P., Sarrion, A., Diaz, E., de la Rubia, M.A., Diaz-Portuondo, E., Coronella, C.J., Mohedano, A.F., 2024. Swine manure management by hydrothermal carbonization: Comparative study of batch and continuous operation. Environ. Res. 245, 118062.
  80. Isemin, R., Mikhalev, A., Milovanov, O., Klimov, D., Kokh-Tatarenko, V., Brulé, M., Tabet, F., Nebyvaev, A., Kuzmin, S., Konyakhin, V., 2022. Comparison of characteristics of poultry litter pellets obtained by the processes of dry and wet torrefaction. Energies 15(6), 2153.
  81. Itoh, T., Iwabuchi, K., Maemoku, N., Chen, S., Taniguro, K., 2020. Role of ambient pressure in self-heating torrefaction of dairy cattle manure. PLoS One 15(5), e0233027.
  82. Jana, K., De, S., 2014. Biomass Integrated Combined Power Plant with Post Combustion Co2 Capture – Performance Study by ASPEN Plus®. Energy Procedia 54, 166–176.
  83. Jang, E.S., Ryu, D.Y., Kim, D., 2022. Hydrothermal carbonization improves the quality of biochar derived from livestock manure by removing inorganic matter. Chemosphere 305, 135391.
  84. Jansen, D., Gazzani, M., Manzolini, G., Dijk, E. Van, Carbo, M., 2015. Pre-combustion CO2 Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 40, 167–187
  85. Jeong, Y.W., Choi, S.K., Choi, Y.S., Kim, S.J., 2015. Production of biocrude-oil from swine manure by fast pyrolysis and analysis of its characteristics. Renew. Energy 79(1), 14–19.
  86. Jeswani, H.K., Whiting, A., Martin, A., Azapagic, A., 2019. Environmental and economic sustainability of poultry litter gasification for electricity and heat generation. Waste Manag. 95, 182–191.
  87. Ji, Z., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Li, X., Li, Z., 2023. Evaluation of composting parameters, technologies and maturity indexes for aerobic manure composting: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 886, 163929.
  88. Jiang, C., Lin, Q., Wang, C., Jiang, X., Bi, H., Bao, L., 2020. Experimental study of the ignition and combustion characteristics of cattle manure under different environmental conditions. Energy 197, 117143.
  89. Jiang, K., Ashworth, P., 2021. The development of carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) research in china: a bibliometric perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 138, 110521.
  90. Jiang, R.Q., Yu, G.W., Yu, L.H., Wang, Yu, Li, C.J., Xing, Z.J., Xue, X.M., Wang, Yin, Yu, C., 2024. Migration of phosphorus in pig manure during pyrolysis process and slow-release mechanism of biochar in hydroponic application. Total Environ. 915, 170116.
  91. Jiang, Y., Li, K., Chen, S., Fu, X., Feng, S., Zhuang, Z., 2022. A sustainable agricultural supply chain considering substituting organic manure for chemical fertilizer. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 29, 432–446.
  92. Jin, Y., Liang, X., He, M., Liu, Y., Tian, G., Shi, J., 2016. Manure biochar influence upon soil properties, phosphorus distribution and phosphatase activities: A microcosm incubation study. Chemosphere 142, 128–135.
  93. Khalilpour, R., Abbas, A., 2011. HEN optimization for efficient retrofitting of coal-fired power plants with post-combustion carbon capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 5(2), 189–199.
  94. Khan, A., Niazi, M.B.K., Ansar, R., Jahan, Z., Javaid, F., Ahmad, R., Anjum, H., Ibrahim, M., Bokhari, A., 2023. Thermochemical conversion of agricultural waste to hydrogen, methane, and biofuels: A review. Fuel 351, 128947.
  95. Kim, J., Park, C., Park, H., Han, J., Lee, J., Kim, S.K., 2022. Upcycling of cattle manure for simultaneous energy recovery and supercapacitor electrode production. Energy 258, 124877.
  96. Kirtania, K., 2018. Thermochemical conversion processes for waste biorefinery. Waste Biorefinery Potential Perspect. 129–156.
  97. Kochanek, J., Soo, R.M., Martinez, C., Dakuidreketi, A., Mudge, A.M., 2022. Biochar for intensification of plant-related industries to meet productivity, sustainability and economic goals: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 179, 106109.
  98. Köninger, J., Lugato, E., Panagos, P., Kochupillai, M., Orgiazzi, A., Briones, M.J.I., 2021. Manure management and soil biodiversity: Towards more sustainable food systems in the EU. Agric. Syst. 194, 103251.
  99. Kota, K.B., Shenbagaraj, S., Sharma, P.K., Sharma, A.K., Ghodke, P.K., Chen, W.H., 2022. Biomass torrefaction: An overview of process and technology assessment based on global readiness level. Fuel 324, 124663.
  100. Kumar, S., Ankaram, S., 2019. Waste-to-Energy model/tool presentation. Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering.Waste treatment processes for energy generation. 239–258.
  101. Kunze, C., Spliethoff, H., 2012. Assessment of oxy-fuel, pre- and post-combustion-based carbon capture for future IGCC plants. Energy 94, 109–116.
  102. Lachos-Perez, D., César Torres-Mayanga, P., Abaide, E.R., Zabot, G.L., De Castilhos, F., 2022. Hydrothermal carbonization and Liquefaction: differences, progress, challenges, and opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 343, 126084.
  103. Lackner, K.S., Park, A.H.A., Miller, B.G., 2010. Eliminating CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants. Generating electricity in a carbon-constrained world.127–173.
  104. Lam, M.K., Loy, A.C.M., Yusup, S., Lee, K.T., 2019. Biohydrogen production from algae. In Pandey, A., Chang, J-S., Hallenbecka. P.C., Larroche, C. (Eds.), Biohydrogen, Second Ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 219–245.
  105. Lang, Q., Guo, Y., Zheng, Q., Liu, Z., Gai, C., 2018. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass and swine manure: Hydrochar properties and heavy metal transformation behavior. Technol. 266, 242–248.
  106. Lang, Q., Zhang, B., Liu, Z., Jiao, W., Xia, Y., Chen, Z., Li, D., Ma, J., Gai, C., 2019. Properties of hydrochars derived from swine manure by CaO assisted hydrothermal carbonization. J. Environ. Manage. 233, 440–446.
  107. Langie, K.M.G., Tak, K., Kim, C., Lee, H.W., Park, K., Kim, D., Jung, W., Lee, C.W., Oh, H.-S., Lee, D.K., 2022. Toward economical application of carbon capture and utilization technology with near-zero carbon emission. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 7482
  108. Lawrence, B., Annamalai, K., Sweeten, J.M., Heflin, K., 2009. Cofiring coal and dairy biomass in a 29 kWt furnace. Appl. Energy 86(11), 2359–2372.
  109. Leclerc, A., Laurent, A., 2017. Framework for estimating toxic releases from the application of manure on agricultural soil: National release inventories for heavy metals in 2000–2014. Total Environ. 590–591, 452–460.
  110. Lee, A., Lewis, D., Kalaitzidis, T., Ashman, P., 2016. Technical issues in the large-scale hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgal biomass to biocrude. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 38, 85–89.
  111. Lee, J., Lin, K.Y.A., Jung, S., Kwon, E.E., 2023. Hybrid renewable energy systems involving thermochemical conversion process for waste-to-energy strategy. Chem. Eng. J. 452, 139218.
  112. Leong, Y.K., Chen, W.H., Lee, D.J., Chang, J.S., 2021. Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) as a potential tool for the valorization of phycoremediation-derived waste algal biomass for biofuel generation. J. Hazard. Mater. 418, 126278.
  113. Leung, D.Y.C., Caramanna, G., Maroto-Valer, M.M., 2014. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 39, 426–443.
  114. Li, C.S., Cai, R.R., Hasan, A., Lu, X.L., Yang, X.X., Zhang, Y.G., 2023. Fertility assessment and nutrient conversion of hydrochars derived from co-hydrothermal carbonization between livestock manure and corn cob. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 11(1), 109166.
  115. Li, F., Wu, X., Ji, W., Gui, X., Chen, Y., Zhao, J., Zhou, C., Ren, T., 2020. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on properties of swine manure biochar and its environmental risks of heavy metals. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 152, 104945.
  116. Li, Q., Lin, H., Zhang, S., Yuan, X., Gholizadeh, M., Wang, Y., Xiang, J., Hu, S., Hu, X., 2021a. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of swine manure and cellulose: Influence of mutual interaction of intermediates on properties of the products. Sci. Total Environ. 791, 148134.
  117. Li, Q., Zhang, S., Gholizadeh, M., Hu, X., Yuan, X., Sarkar, B., Vithanage, M., Mašek, O., Ok, Y.S., 2021b. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of swine and chicken manure: Influence of cross-interaction on hydrochar and liquid characteristics. Total Environ. 786, 147381.
  118. Li, J., Akdeniz, N., Kim, H.H.M., Gates, R.S., Wang, X., Wang, K., 2021c. Quantification of sustainable animal manure utilization strategies in Hangzhou, China. Agric. Syst. 191, 103150.
  119. Lin, Q., Zhang, X., Wang, T., Zheng, C., Gao, X., 2022. Technical perspective of carbon capture, utilization, and storage. Engineering 14, 27–32.
  120. Liu, Q., Kong, G., Zhang, G., Cao, T., Wang, K., Zhang, X., Han, L., 2023. Recent advances in hydrothermal liquefaction of manure wastes into value-added products. Energy Convers. Manag. 292, 117392.
  121. Liu, Q., Lian, G., Dong, W., Su, Y., Leong, W.Q., Wang, C.-H., Zhong, W., 2025. A three-dimensional CFD numerical simulation study on pressurized oxy-fuel gasification of poultry manure in an industrial-scale gasifier. Chinese J. Chem. Eng.
  122. Liu, Q., Wang, Yiying, Leong, W.Q., Gu, Y., Lin, A., Wang, Yuchen, Yu, A., Zhong, W., Wang, C.H., 2024. Study of a commercial-scale poultry manure oxy-fuel gasification plant via CFD modeling and safety assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 185, 107248.
  123. Liu, Q., Xu, R., Yan, C., Han, L., Lei, H., Ruan, R., Zhang, X., 2021. Fast hydrothermal co-liquefaction of corn stover and cow manure for biocrude and hydrochar production. Bioresour. Technol. 340, 125630
  124. Liu, Q., Zhang, G., Liu, M., Kong, G., Xu, R., Han, L., Zhang, X., 2022a. Fast hydrothermal liquefaction coupled with homogeneous catalysts to valorize livestock manure for enhanced biocrude oil and hydrochar production. Renew. Energy 198, 521–533.
  125. Liu, S., Cao, W., Wang, Y., Wei, W., Li, L., Jin, H., Guo, L., 2022b. Characteristics and mechanisms of nitrogen transformation during chicken manure gasification in supercritical water. Waste Manag. 153, 240–248.
  126. Long, S., Jiang, H., Shi, J., Ai, X., Que, Z., Nie, H., Xu, C.C., Huang, R., Fu, Y., Yang, W., 2023. Separated two-stage hydrothermal liquefaction of livestock manure for high-quality bio-oil with low-nitrogen content: Insights on nitrogen migration and evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 477, 146999.
  127. Loppinet-Serani, A., Aymonier, C., 2014. Hydrolysis in near- and supercritical water for biomass conversion and material recycling. In Anikeev, V., Fan, M. (Eds), Supercritical fluid technology for energy and environmental applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 139–156.
  128. Lu, J., Watson, J., Zeng, J., Li, H., Zhu, Z., Wang, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z., 2018. Biocrude production and heavy metal migration during hydrothermal liquefaction of swine manure. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 115, 108–115.
  129. Lu, X., Ma, X., Qin, Z., Chen, X., Yue, W., 2022. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge and swine manure: Hydrochar properties and heavy metal chemical speciation. Fuel 330, 125573
  130. Lundgren, J., Pettersson, E., 2009. Combustion of horse manure for heat production. Bioresour. Technol. 100(12), 3121–3126.
  131. Lyu, L., Bagchi, M., Markoglou, N., An, C., Peng, H., Bi, H., Yang, X., Sun, H., 2024. Towards environmentally sustainable management: A review on the generation, degradation, and recycling of polypropylene face mask waste. J. Hazard. Mater. 461, 132566.
  132. Ma, K., Shi, T., Hu, Y., Yang, S., Shen, W., He, C., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Ren, J., 2022. Poultry litter utilization for waste-to-wealth: Valorization process simulation and comparative analysis based on thermodynamic and techno-economic assessment. Energy Convers. Manag. 269, 116135.
  133. Ma, M., Du, M., Zhang, S., Chen, Y., Chen, B., Guo, L., 2025. Synthesis of kinetic analysis and regression optimization for highly efficient conversion of pig manure in supercritical water. Energy 326, 136105.
  134. Mandal, S., Donner, E., Vasileiadis, S., Skinner, W., Smith, E., Lombi, E., 2018. The effect of biochar feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, and application rate on the reduction of ammonia volatilisation from biochar-amended soil. Sci. Total Environ. 627, 942–950.
  135. Manogaran, M.D., Shamsuddin, R., Mohd Yusoff, M.H., Lay, M., Siyal, A.A., 2022. A review on treatment processes of chicken manure. Clean. Circ. Bioeconomy 2, 100013.
  136. Mariyam, S., Alherbawi, M., Pradhan, S., Al-Ansari, T., McKay, G., 2023. Biochar yield prediction using response surface methodology: effect of fixed carbon and pyrolysis operating conditions. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 14(22), 28879–28892.
  137. Matayeva, A., Rasmussen, S.R., Biller, P., 2022. Distribution of nutrients and phosphorus recovery in hydrothermal liquefaction of waste streams. Biomass Bioenergy 156, 106323.
  138. Mathimani, T., Baldinelli, A., Rajendran, K., Prabakar, D., Matheswaran, M., Pieter van Leeuwen, R., Pugazhendhi, A., 2019. Review on cultivation and thermochemical conversion of microalgae to fuels and chemicals: Process evaluation and knowledge gaps. J. Clean. Prod. 28, 1053-1064.
  139. Matthews, K.R., 2023. Manure management. In Matthews, M.K., Salvi,D., (Eds.),The produce contamination problem. Third Ed. Academic Press, New York, United States, pp. 47–66.
  140. Meng, J., Zhang, H., Cui, Z., Guo, H., Mašek, O., Sarkar, B., Wang, H., Bolan, N., Shan, S., 2022. Comparative study on the characteristics and environmental risk of potentially toxic elements in biochar obtained via pyrolysis of swine manure at lab and pilot scales. Sci. Total Environ. 825, 153941.
  141. Molino, A., Chianese, S., Musmarra, D., 2016. Biomass gasification technology: The state of the art overview. J. Energy Chem. 25(1), 10–25.
  142. Nanda, S., Dalai, A.K., Gökalp, I., Kozinski, J.A., 2016. Valorization of horse manure through catalytic supercritical water gasification. Waste Manag. 52, 147–158.
  143. Nanda, S., Gong, M., Hunter, H.N., Dalai, A.K., Gökalp, I., Kozinski, J.A., 2017. An assessment of pinecone gasification in subcritical, near-critical and supercritical water. Fuel Process. Technol. 168, 84–96.
  144. Nasrollahzadeh, M., Nezafat, Z., Shafiei, N., 2021. Lignin chemistry and valorization. In Nasrollahzadeh, M. (Ed.), Biopolymer-based metal nanoparticle chemistry for sustainable applications. volume 1: classification, properties and synthesis, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 145–183.
  145. Niu, Y., Lv, Y., Lei, Y., Liu, S., Liang, Y., Wang, D., Hui, S., 2019. Biomass torrefaction: properties, applications, challenges, and economy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 115, 109395.
  146. Ong, H.C., Yu, K.L., Chen, W.H., Pillejera, M.K., Bi, X., Tran, K.Q., Pétrissans, A., Pétrissans, M., 2021. Variation of lignocellulosic biomass structure from torrefaction: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 152, 111698.
  147. Oreggioni, G.D., Friedrich, D., Brandani, S., Ahn, H., 2014. Techno-economic study of adsorption processes for pre-combustion carbon capture at a biomass CHP plant. Energy Procedia 63, 6738–6744.
  148. Oreggioni, G.D., Singh, B., Cherubini, F., Guest, G., Lausselet, C., Luberti, M., Ahn, H., Strømman, A.H., 2017. Environmental assessment of biomass gasification combined heat and power plants with absorptive and adsorptive carbon capture units in Norway. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 57, 162–172.
  149. Otero, M., Sánchez, M.E., Gómez, X., 2011. Co-firing of coal and manure biomass: A TG–MS approach. Bioresour. Technol. 102(17), 8304–8309.
  150. Padurean, A., Cormos, C.C., Agachi, P.S., 2012. Pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture by gas–liquid absorption for integrated gasification combined cycle power plants. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 7, 1–11.
  151. Pandey, D.S., Kwapinska, M., Gómez-Barea, A., Horvat, A., Fryda, L.E., Rabou, L.P.L.M., Leahy, J.J., Kwapinski, W., 2016. Poultry litter gasification in a fluidized bed reactor: effects of gasifying agent and limestone addition. Energy Fuels 30(4), 3085–3096.
  152. Patel, M., Zhang, X., Kumar, A., 2016. Techno-economic and life cycle assessment on lignocellulosic biomass thermochemical conversion technologies: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53, 1486–1499.
  153. Pattey, E., Trzcinski, M.K., Desjardins, R.L., 2005. Quantifying the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as a result of composting dairy and beef cattle manure. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 72(2), 173–187
  154. Pauline, A.L., Joseph, K., 2020. Hydrothermal carbonization of organic wastes to carbonaceous solid fuel – A review of mechanisms and process parameters. Fuel 279, 118472.
  155. Preuss, N., You, F., 2024. Consequential versus attributional life cycle optimization of poultry manure management technologies in a food-energy-water-waste nexus. J. Clean. Prod. 469, 143133.
  156. Priya, A., Naseem, S., Pandey, D., Bhowmick, A., Attrah, M., Dutta, K., Rene, E.R., Suman, S.K., Daverey, A., 2023. Innovative strategies in algal biomass pretreatment for biohydrogen production. Bioresour. Technol. 369, 128446.
  157. Pudova, Y.D., Larina, O.M., Zaichenko, V.M., 2020. Effect of temperature process at chicken litter torrefaction on properties of products obtained, in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, p. 12020.
  158. Qiu, J., Fernandes de Souza, M., Robles-Aguilar, A.A., Ghysels, S., Ok, Y.S., Ronsse, F., Meers, E., 2023. Improving biochar properties by co-pyrolysis of pig manure with bio-invasive weed for use as the soil amendment. Chemosphere 312, 137229.
  159. Ren, C., Guo, S., Wang, Y., Liu, S., Du, M., Chen, Y., Guo, L., 2022. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of auto-thermal supercritical water gasification polygeneration system of pig manure. Chem. Eng. J. 427, 131938.
  160. Ren, J., Cao, J.P., Zhao, X.Y., Yang, F.L., Wei, X.Y., 2019. Recent advances in syngas production from biomass catalytic gasification: A critical review on reactors, catalysts, catalytic mechanisms and mathematical models. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 116, 109426.
  161. Ren, X., Wang, Q., Li, R., Chang, C.C., Pan, J., Zhang, Z., 2020. Effect of clay on greenhouse gas emissions and humification during pig manure composting as supported by spectroscopic evidence. Sci. Total Environ. 737, 139712.
  162. Restrepo-Valencia, S., Walter, A., 2023. BECCS opportunities in Brazil: Comparison of pre and post-combustion capture in a typical sugarcane mill. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 124, 103859.
  163. Rezaei, S., Liu, A., Hovington, P., 2023. Emerging technologies in post-combustion carbon dioxide capture & removal. Catal. Today 423, 114286.
  164. Roni, M.S., Chowdhury, S., Mamun, S., Marufuzzaman, M., Lein, W., Johnson, S., 2017. Biomass co-firing technology with policies, challenges, and opportunities: A global review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 78, 1089–1101.
  165. Rout, P.R., Pandey, D.S., Haynes-Parry, M., Briggs, C., Manuel, H.L.C., Umapathi, R., Mukherjee, S., Panigrahi, S., Goel, M., 2022. Sustainable valorisation of animal manures via thermochemical conversion technologies: an inclusive review on recent trends. Waste Biomass Valorization 142 14(2), 553–582.
  166. Rubinsin, N.J., Karim, N.A., Timmiati, S.N., Lim, K.L., Isahak, W.N.R.W., Pudukudy, M., 2024. An overview of the enhanced biomass gasification for hydrogen production. J. Hydrogen Energy 49, 1139–1164.
  167. Ruiz-Dueñas, F.J., Martínez, Á.T., 2009. Microbial degradation of lignin: how a bulky recalcitrant polymer is efficiently recycled in nature and how we can take advantage of this. Microb. Biotechnol. 2(2), 164–177.
  168. Russo, M.E., Olivieri, G., Marzocchella, A., Salatino, P., Caramuscio, P., Cavaleiro, C., 2013. Post-combustion carbon capture mediated by carbonic anhydrase. Sep. Purif. Technol. 107, 331–339.
  169. Sajeev, E.P.M., Amon, B., Ammon, C., Zollitsch, W., Winiwarter, W., 2018. Evaluating the potential of dietary crude protein manipulation in reducing ammonia emissions from cattle and pig manure: A meta-analysis. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 110(1), 161–175.
  170. Serrano, J.R., Arnau, F.J., García-Cuevas, L.M., Farias, V.H., 2021. Oxy-fuel combustion feasibility of compression ignition engines using oxygen separation membranes for enabling carbon dioxide capture. Energy Convers. Manag. 247, 114732.
  171. Shahabuddin, M., Alam, M.T., Krishna, B.B., Bhaskar, T., Perkins, G., 2020. A review on the production of renewable aviation fuels from the gasification of biomass and residual wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 312, 123596.
  172. Shahbaz, M., AlNouss, A., Ghiat, I., Mckay, G., Mackey, H., Elkhalifa, S., Al-Ansari, T., 2021. A comprehensive review of biomass based thermochemical conversion technologies integrated with CO2 capture and utilisation within BECCS networks. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 173, 105734.
  173. Shahbeik, H., Peng, W., Kazemi Shariat Panahi, H., Dehhaghi, M., Guillemin, G.J., Fallahi, A., Amiri, H., Rehan, M., Raikwar, D., Latine, H., Pandalone, B., Khoshnevisan, B., Sonne, C., Vaccaro, L., Nizami, A.S., Gupta, V.K., Lam, S.S., Pan, J., Luque, R., Sels, B., Tabatabaei, M., Aghbashlo, M., 2022. Synthesis of liquid biofuels from biomass by hydrothermal gasification: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 167, 112833.
  174. Shanableh, A., Abdallah, M., Tayara, A., Ghenai, C., Kamil, M., Inayat, A., Shabib, A., 2021. Experimental characterization and assessment of bio- and thermo-chemical energy potential of dromedary manure. Biomass Bioenergy 148, 106058.
  175. Sharma, S.K., Shivapuji, A.M., Dasappa, S., 2024. Characterization of a novel two-stage high ash coal gasifier for low tar and high calorific value gas. Appl. Therm. Eng. 237, 121775.
  176. Shen, X., Huang, G., Yang, Z., Han, L., 2015. Compositional characteristics and energy potential of Chinese animal manure by type and as a whole. Appl. Energy 160, 108–119.
  177. Sieborg, M.U., Nielsen, A.K.H., Ottosen, L.D.M., Daasbjerg, K., Kofoed, M.V.W., 2024. Bio-integrated carbon capture and utilization: at the interface between capture chemistry and archaeal CO2 Nat. Commun. 15(1), 7492.
  178. Song, E., Kim, H., Kim, K.W., Yoon, Y.-M., 2023. Characteristic evaluation of different carbonization processes for hydrochar, torrefied char, and biochar produced from cattle manure. Energies 16(7), 3265.
  179. Stylianou, M., Christou, A., Dalias, P., Polycarpou, P., Michael, C., Agapiou, A., Papanastasiou, P., Fatta-Kassinos, D., 2020. Physicochemical and structural characterization of biochar derived from the pyrolysis of biosolids, cattle manure and spent coffee grounds. J. Energy Inst. 93(5), 2063–2073.
  180. Su, G., Ong, H.C., Mohd Zulkifli, N.W., Ibrahim, S., Chen, W.H., Chong, C.T., Ok, Y.S., 2022. Valorization of animal manure via pyrolysis for bioenergy: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 343, 130965.
  181. Sun, Y., Dong, B., Wang, L., Li, H., Thorin, E., 2022. Technology selection for capturing CO2 from wood pyrolysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 266, 115835.
  182. Sweeten, J.M., Annamalai, K., Thien, B., McDonald, L.A., 2003. Co-firing of coal and cattle feedlot biomass (FB) fuels. Part I. Feedlot biomass (cattle manure) fuel quality and characteristics. Fuel 82(10), 1167–1182.
  183. Tao, Y., You, F., 2022. Consequential life cycle assessment: Evaluating the environmental impact of dairy manure treatment using thermochemical conversion technologies. A-Z Biorefinery. A Comprehensive View. 607–637.
  184. Taupe, N.C., Lynch, D., Wnetrzak, R., Kwapinska, M., Kwapinski, W., Leahy, J.J., 2016. Updraft gasification of poultry litter at farm-scale – A case study. Waste Manag. 50, 324–333.
  185. Tezer, Ö., Karabağ, N., Öngen, A., Çolpan, C.Ö., Ayol, A., 2022. Biomass gasification for sustainable energy production: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47(34), 15419–15433.
  186. Theegala, C.S., Midgett, J.S., 2012. Hydrothermal liquefaction of separated dairy manure for production of bio-oils with simultaneous waste treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 107, 456–463.
  187. Theo, W.L., Lim, J.S., Hashim, H., Mustaffa, A.A., Ho, W.S., 2016. Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage. Appl. Energy 183, 1633–1663.
  188. Toor, S.S., Rosendahl, L., Rudolf, A., 2011. Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: A review of subcritical water technologies. Energy 36(5), 2328–2342.
  189. Touray, N., Tsai, W.T., Chen, H.R., Liu, S.C., 2014. Thermochemical and pore properties of goat-manure-derived biochars prepared from different pyrolysis temperatures. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 109, 116–122.
  190. Tsai, W.T., Liu, S.C., Chen, H.R., Chang, Y.M., Tsai, Y.L., 2012. Textural and chemical properties of swine-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use as a soil amendment. Chemosphere 89(2), 198–203.
  191. Turzyński, T., Kluska, J., Kardaś, D., 2022. Study on chicken manure combustion and heat production in terms of thermal self-sufficiency of a poultry farm. Renew. Energy 191, 84–91.
  192. Tushar, M.S.H.K., Dutta, A., Xu, C.C., 2016. Catalytic supercritical gasification of biocrude from hydrothermal liquefaction of cattle manure. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 189, 119–132.
  193. Valizadeh, S., Hakimian, H., Farooq, A., Jeon, B.H., Chen, W.H., Hoon Lee, S., Jung, S.C., Won Seo, M., Park, Y.K., 2022. Valorization of biomass through gasification for green hydrogen generation: A comprehensive review. Bioresour. Technol. 365, 128143.
  194. Vardon, D.R., Sharma, B.K., Scott, J., Yu, G., Wang, Z., Schideman, L., Zhang, Y., Strathmann, T.J., 2011. Chemical properties of biocrude oil from the hydrothermal liquefaction of Spirulina algae, swine manure, and digested anaerobic sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 102(17), 8295–8303.
  195. Varma, V.S., Parajuli, R., Scott, E., Canter, T., Lim, T.T., Popp, J., Thoma, G., 2021. Dairy and swine manure management – Challenges and perspectives for sustainable treatment technology. Total Environ. 778, 146319.
  196. Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Lin, J.G., Zhang, N., Cao, W., 2021. Biogas energy generated from livestock manure in China: Current situation and future trends. Environ. Manage. 297, 113324.
  197. Wu, K., Gao, Y., Zhu, G., Zhu, J., Yuan, Q., Chen, Y., Cai, M., Feng, L., 2017. Characterization of dairy manure hydrochar and aqueous phase products generated by hydrothermal carbonization at different temperatures. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 127, 335–342.
  198. Wu, Q., Wang, H., Zheng, X., Liu, F., Wang, A., Zou, D., Yuan, J., Xiao, Z., 2020. Thermochemical liquefaction of pig manure: Factors influencing on oil. Fuel 264, 116884.
  199. Wu, R., Lv, P., He, X., Bai, Y., Wang, J., Wei, J., Su, W., Song, X., Yu, G., 2025. Tandem catalytic upgrading of cow manure pyrolysis vapors by Beta zeolite and nitrogen-doped activated carbon dual catalysts prepared from coal gasification fine slag to produce light aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 13(2), 115508.
  200. Wu, R., Lv, P., Wang, J., Bai, Y., Wei, J., Song, X., Su, W., Yu, G., 2023. Catalytic upgrading of cow manure pyrolysis vapors over zeolite/carbon composites prepared from coal gasification fine slag: High quality bio-oil obtaining and mechanism investigation. Fuel 339, 126941.
  201. Xiao, X., Le, D.D., Li, L., Meng, X., Cao, J., Morishita, K., Takarada, T., 2010. Catalytic steam gasification of biomass in fluidized bed at low temperature: Conversion from livestock manure compost to hydrogen-rich syngas. Biomass Bioenergy 34(10), 1505–1512.
  202. Xie, Y., Zheng, X., Gao, W., 2022. Gasification of horse dung in supercritical water. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47(9), 5871–5878.
  203. Xiong, J. bo, Pan, Z. qian, Xiao, X. feng, Huang, H. jun, Lai, F. ying, Wang, J. xin, Chen, S. wei, 2019. Study on the hydrothermal carbonization of swine manure: The effect of process parameters on the yield/properties of hydrochar and process water. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 144, 104692.
  204. Xu, Z.X., Ma, X.Q., Zhou, J., Duan, P.G., Zhou, W.Y., Ahmad, A., Luque, R., 2022. The influence of key reactions during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge on aqueous phase properties: A review. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 167, 105678.
  205. Xue, P., Chen, T., Huang, X., Hu, Q., Hu, J., Zhang, H., Yang, H., Chen, H., 2024. Prediction of syngas properties of biomass steam gasification in fluidized bed based on machine learning method. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 49, 356–370.
  206. Yang, X., Li, Q., Tang, Z., Zhang, W., Yu, G., Shen, Q., Zhao, F.J., 2017. Heavy metal concentrations and arsenic speciation in animal manure composts in China. Waste Manag. 64, 333–339.
  207. Yang, X., Zhao, Z., Zhao, Y., Xu, L., Feng, S., Wang, Z., Zhang, L., Shen, B., 2024. Effects of torrefaction pretreatment on fuel quality and combustion characteristics of biomass: A review. Fuel 358, 130314.
  208. Yin, J., Zhao, L., Xu, X., Li, D., Qiu, H., Cao, X., 2022. Evaluation of long-term carbon sequestration of biochar in soil with biogeochemical field model. Total Environ. 822, 153576.
  209. Yuan, X., He, T., Cao, H., Yuan, Q., 2017. Cattle manure pyrolysis process: Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis with isoconversional methods. Renew. Energy 107, 489–496.
  210. Yue, Y., Lin, Q., Xu, Y., Li, G., Zhao, X., 2017. Slow pyrolysis as a measure for rapidly treating cow manure and the biochar characteristics. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 124, 355–361.
  211. Zhang, D., Sun, Z., Fu, H., Liu, Z., Wang, F., Zeng, J., Yi, W., 2024. Upgrading of cow manure by hydrothermal carbonization: Evaluation of fuel properties, combustion behaviors and kinetics. Renew. Energy 225, 120269.
  212. Zhang, J., Liu, J., Evrendilek, F., Xie, W., Kuo, J., Zhang, X., Buyukada, M., 2019. Kinetics, thermodynamics, gas evolution and empirical optimization of cattle manure combustion in air and oxy-fuel atmospheres. Therm. Eng. 149, 119–131.
  213. Zhang, L., Xu, C. (Charles), Champagne, P., 2010. Overview of recent advances in thermo-chemical conversion of biomass. Energy Convers. Manag. 51(5), 969–982.
  214. Zhang, P., Zhang, X., Yuan, X., Xie, R., Han, L., 2021. Characteristics, adsorption behaviors, Cu(II) adsorption mechanisms by cow manure biochar derived at various pyrolysis temperatures. Bioresour. Technol. 331, 125013.
  215. Zhang, Q., Yin, Z., He, D., Yan, W., Liu, C., 2025. Cracking the lignocellulosic code: Comparative insights into various pretreatment techniques for enhanced degradation in cattle manure. Process Biochem. 153, 34–46.
  216. Zhang, Y., Wu, S., Cui, D., Yoon, S.J., Bae, Y.S., Park, B., Wu, Y., Zhou, F., Pan, C., Xiao, R., 2022. Energy and CO2 emission analysis of a Bio-Energy with CCS system: Biomass gasification-solid oxide fuel cell-mini gas turbine-CO2 Fuel Process. Technol. 238, 107476.
  217. Zheng, Y., Tao, L., Yang, X., Huang, Y., Liu, C., Zheng, Z., 2019. Comparative study on pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis upgrading of biomass model compounds: Thermochemical behaviors, kinetics, and aromatic hydrocarbon formation. J. Energy Inst. 92(5), 1348–1363.
  218. Zhou, S., Liang, H., Han, L., Huang, G., Yang, Z., 2019. The influence of manure feedstock, slow pyrolysis, and hydrothermal temperature on manure thermochemical and combustion properties. Waste Manag. 88, 85–95.
  219. Zhou, T., Shi, H., Ding, X., Zhou, Y., 2021. Thermodynamic modeling and rational design of ionic liquids for pre-combustion carbon capture. Chem. Eng. Sci. 229, 116076.
  220. Zhou, X., Li, W., Mabon, R., Broadbelt, L.J., 2018. A mechanistic model of fast pyrolysis of hemicellulose. Energy Environ. Sci. 11(5), 1240–1260.