Document Type : Review Paper
Authors
1
Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE), Institute of Tropical Aquaculture and Fisheries (AKUATROP), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu 21030, Malaysia.
2
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
3
Department of System Process Engineering, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.
4
Institute of Waste Management and Circular Economy, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Technische Universität Dresden, Pratzschwitzer 15, 01796 Pirna, Germany.
5
Departamento de Física Aplicada, Escuela de Ingenierías Industriales, Universidad de Extremadura, Avd. de Elvas s/n, 06006 Badajoz, Spain.
6
Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Ege University, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye.
7
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, Ege University, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Türkiye.
8
Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
9
Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Plant Sciences Unit, Merelbeke 9820, Belgium.
10
Institute of Natural Resource Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland.
Abstract
The increasing reliance on commercial inorganic fertilizers has raised significant environmental and economic concerns, including soil degradation, nutrient leaching, water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. This review critically evaluates biomass-derived chars produced via thermochemical processes, i.e., pyrolysis, gasification, and hydrothermal carbonization, as potential alternatives to synthetic fertilizers. Among the three biomass-derived chars, biochar stands out as the most viable option for soil amendment due to its high stability, nutrient retention capacity, and long-term carbon sequestration benefits. Gasification char, despite its high porosity and adsorption capacity, often lacks bioavailable nutrients, whereas hydrochar, though rich in organic compounds, poses challenges related to stability and phytotoxicity. Biochar application has been shown to significantly reduce N2O emissions, enhance soil water retention, and mitigate nutrient runoff, offering clear environmental advantages over conventional fertilizers. Moreover, biochar has transitioned from an experimental soil amendment to a commercially available product with increasing adoption in agriculture worldwide, further reinforcing its practical viability. However, large-scale implementation still faces economic and logistical constraints, including high production costs, transportation inefficiencies, and regulatory uncertainties. Addressing these challenges through policy incentives such as subsidies and carbon credits can enhance the economic feasibility of biochar production and application. Given these findings, this review focuses on biochar as the most practical and sustainable alternative to commercial inorganic fertilizers.
Graphical Abstract
Highlights
- Biomass-derived chars were assessed as alternatives to inorganic fertilizers.
- Inorganic fertilizer use raises environmental concerns and market volatility.
- Biochar offers the best balance of soil enhancement and carbon sequestration.
- Biochar improves nutrient retention and reduces environmental impact.
- Economic and regulatory factors limit large-scale biochar adoption.
Keywords